Amid sweeping changes in U.S. foreign policy under President Joe Biden, analysts are linking these reversals of Trump policies with heightened global discord.

According to Joel Pollak of Breitbart News, President Biden's shift from previous U.S. policies has been critically linked to increasing global conflicts, particularly in the Middle East and Europe.

Upon assuming office, President Biden indicated a strategic pivot from his predecessor's approach with the statement, “America is back,” which contrasted sharply with former President Donald Trump’s "America first" philosophy.

This shift was intended to reinstate the U.S. as an active global participant in various international bodies and agreements.

Biden’s Policy Reversals and International Responses

The Biden administration embarked on several significant reversals of policies instituted by the Trump administration. One of the first major changes was the restoration of funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which aids Palestinian refugees.

Some saw this move as a crucial support for refugee welfare, while others viewed it as a potential imbalance in Israeli-Palestinian relations.

Another key area where Biden diverged from Trump’s policies was his approach to European energy and security pipelines. Notably, the decision to drop sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, intended to carry natural gas from Russia to Germany, raised concerns over Europe's energy dependency on Russia, an aspect heavily critiqued during Trump’s tenure.

Rejoining International Agreements: A Controversial Strategy

Biden’s attempts to reengage with international agreements also included complex negotiations to reenter the Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

This move, aimed at restraining Iran's nuclear capabilities, has been contentious, with arguments centered on its potential to either stabilize or destabilize regional security.

Furthermore, the administration’s decision to rejoin the United Nations Human Rights Council was aimed at promoting global human rights, but it has faced criticism regarding the council's efficiency and biases.

Shifts in Middle East Policy and Consequences

In the Middle East, Biden’s foreign policy shifts entailed significant changes, such as removing the Houthis in Yemen from the terrorism list and lifting sanctions on Venezuela’s government. These actions aimed to foster negotiation and peace but were met with skepticism concerning their impact on regional stability and U.S. security interests.

One of the more controversial decisions was the administration’s stance at the United Nations, where it opposed certain actions of Israel. This move deviated sharply from the previous administration's stark support for Israeli government policies.

Furthermore, withholding military support from Israel and sanctioning certain Israeli individuals marked a notable shift in the traditional U.S.-Israeli relationship.

Assessing the Global Impact of Biden’s Foreign Policy

These policy changes and their implementation have stirred debate among international relations experts. Some argue they represent necessary steps towards more balanced and humane foreign policies. Others contend they might weaken diplomatic alliances, potentially making conflict more likely in sensitive regions like the Middle East and Europe.

The outcomes of these policy shifts are yet to be fully realized, and the global community remains attentive to the broader implications of the U.S.’s redefined role on the world stage under Biden’s leadership. Observers continue to monitor these developments, questioning whether these new approaches will lead to sustainable peace or foster further discord.

Conclusion: Evaluating the Shift in U.S. Foreign Policy

President Joe Biden’s reversal of several foreign policies of the Trump era highlights a significant redirection in U.S. international relations strategy.

From re-engaging with international bodies and altering Middle East policies to negotiating with adversarial states, these changes have potentially set a new course that could either enhance global stability or foster further geopolitical conflicts.

As the Biden administration continues to navigate these complex international waters, the world watches closely, making it imperative to continue evaluating these policies and their impacts over time.