A bombshell revelation exposes multiple segments omitted from Vice President Kamala Harris's controversial 60 Minutes interview.

According to Daily Mail, the Federal Communications Commission ordered CBS to release the original unedited version of the interview after Donald Trump sued the network, claiming they deliberately edited it to disadvantage him in the presidential election.

The unedited footage reveals CBS aired only 20 minutes of the hour-long interview with Harris. Multiple segments were cut, including her responses about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, NATO expansion, and her views on Donald Trump. The network also trimmed her answers about economic plans and foreign policy positions.

Released footage shows stark differences in Harris responses

The original interview opened with an unexpected moment, showing the Vice President sneezing and explaining she was "allergic to mold." CBS edited out significant portions of Harris's responses regarding Donald Trump, particularly when interviewer Bill Whitaker questioned her about calling the former president racist and divisive.

In the unedited version, Harris launched into a lengthy response about Trump's comments regarding illegal migrants in Springfield, Ohio.

She discussed her experience as a District Attorney and made comparisons about the responsible use of public platforms. The Vice President also shared an emotional story about elementary school children affected by Trump's rhetoric.

The network chose to broadcast a significantly condensed version of Harris's response, removing references to specific incidents and her personal experiences in law enforcement. This editorial decision substantially altered the tone and content of her message about Trump's impact on communities.

Network editorial decisions shape Iran and Israel coverage

When asked about America's greatest adversary, Harris identified Iran in the unedited footage. She elaborated on Iran's threats and emphasized preventing nuclear capabilities as a top priority. However, when Whitaker pressed for specifics about potential military action against Iran's nuclear program, Harris declined to discuss hypotheticals.

The Vice President's detailed responses about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the ongoing conflict were largely cut from the broadcast. Her comments about achieving peace through hostage deals, ceasefires, and humanitarian aid were condensed significantly in the final edit.

CBS also removed extensive portions of Harris's discussion about maintaining U.S. diplomatic pressure while seeking long-term solutions in the region. These editorial choices effectively reduced complex foreign policy positions to brief soundbites.

Economic plans and presidential aspirations receive selective editing

The network's treatment of Harris's economic vision showed notable differences between the original and broadcast versions. When questioned about the estimated $3 trillion federal deficit impact of her economic plan, CBS kept only portions of her response while removing references to multiple economic analysts and inflation concerns.

Whitaker asked Harris why a quarter of registered voters still felt they didn't know her despite her years in national politics. The Vice President's complete answer included extensive comments about traveling the country and earning voters' support through direct engagement.

The aired version eliminated several passages where Harris discussed her outreach efforts and campaign strategy, focusing instead on broader themes about earning public trust and support.

Critical moments reshape interview narrative

Bill Whitaker's original question to Harris about her position on NATO expansion for Ukraine received a multifaceted response that CBS significantly altered. The unedited version captured her detailed analysis of America's role in supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and strengthening NATO alliances.

The network's final cut removed substantial portions addressing current administration policies, instead highlighting Harris's criticism of Trump's potential impact on NATO. This editorial decision emphasized political contrasts over policy specifics.

A similar pattern emerged in Harris's China discussion, where CBS omitted her complete response about protecting American business interests and addressing fentanyl trafficking concerns.

Looking ahead with lasting implications

The release of the unedited interview footage by the Federal Communications Commission followed Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS News in October 2024. The former president alleged the network deliberately edited the interview to influence the presidential election outcome.

The comparison between the original and broadcast versions revealed significant editorial decisions that shaped public perception of Vice President Harris's positions on crucial domestic and international issues. These revelations have sparked renewed debate about media coverage and editorial responsibility in political journalism.