A social media personality known for flaunting cash and mocking American taxpayers faces deportation after promoting illegal squatting schemes to his followers.

According to Fox News, Leonel Moreno, a 26-year-old Venezuelan migrant who amassed hundreds of thousands of followers by encouraging illegal immigrants to "invade" American homes, has been deported by the Trump administration.

Moreno gained notoriety through his TikTok videos where he brazenly displayed stacks of hundred-dollar bills while urging migrants to exploit squatters' rights laws.

His controversial content included detailed instructions on how to take over abandoned properties and eventually sell them for profit, drawing widespread criticism and ultimately leading to his arrest in Ohio.

Social Media Fame Built on Controversial Content

Moreno's rise to social media stardom centered around his provocative messages targeting both American citizens and working immigrants.

His TikTok account, which attracted approximately 500,000 followers before being shut down, featured a mix of inflammatory content ranging from emotional appeals to outright mockery of the American system.

His videos often showcased an ostentatious display of wealth, with Moreno frequently waving cash while delivering controversial messages about his intentions in America. The content creator made no secret of his disdain for traditional employment, instead promoting various schemes to exploit social services and housing laws.

Through his social media presence, Moreno claimed to receive significant income from both government assistance programs and his online activities. He boasted about collecting $350 weekly in government benefits for his family since entering the United States illegally, while simultaneously generating up to $1,000 per week from his viral content.

Government Benefits and Social Media Profits

Moreno openly shared with his followers:

I didn't cross the Rio Grande to work like a slave. I came to the U.S. to mark my territory. You're hurt because I make more than you without much work while you work like slaves, understand? That's the difference between you and me. I'm always going to make lots of money without much work, and you're always going to be exploited and miserable and insignificant.

The influencer's confrontational approach and explicit promotion of illegal activities eventually caught the attention of law enforcement.

Despite TikTok terminating his primary account, Moreno continued his activities on other platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, until his arrest.

Legal Proceedings and Deportation Process

Immigration authorities apprehended Moreno following the viral spread of his controversial content. His case underwent significant legal proceedings, with a federal judge ordering his removal in September.

However, complications arose when Venezuelan authorities initially refused to accept deportation flights during the Biden administration's tenure.

The situation represented a complex immigration enforcement challenge, highlighting the difficulties in executing deportation orders when home countries resist accepting their citizens. Moreno's case particularly stood out due to his high-profile social media presence and explicit advocacy for illegal activities.

Prior to his deportation, Moreno had entered the United States illegally near Eagle Pass, Texas, in 2022. He was initially released into the country under the border parole system, a decision that would later face scrutiny given his subsequent activities.

Final Resolution and Policy Implications

The Trump administration confirmed Moreno's deportation through their official @RapidResponse47 X account on Friday, marking the end of a controversial chapter in recent immigration enforcement history. The case has drawn attention to the broader issues of social media influence, immigration policy, and property rights.

Moreno's removal from the United States stands as a significant enforcement action against an individual who openly promoted illegal activities targeting American homeowners.

The case has sparked discussions about the intersection of social media, immigration enforcement, and property rights protection in contemporary America.