Democratic insiders are making headlines after a former aide to President Joe Biden revealed how far some staffers were willing to go to keep Donald Trump out of the White House. Alex Thompson, a reporter at Axios, shared explosive details on Fox News Sunday that have ignited fierce debate across Washington.

According to Breitbart, Biden administration insiders justified “undemocratic things” in their bid to defeat what they saw as an “existential threat” posed by President Trump. The admission has fueled concerns about the inner workings of the Biden White House and the motivations behind staff decisions at the highest levels.

Thompson’s reporting describes a climate in which some aides saw themselves as the real power brokers, often insulated from President Biden’s oversight. Their belief that Trump endangered American democracy led to a willingness, according to Thompson, to rationalize nearly anything in pursuit of their goal—even actions they recognized as undemocratic.

Staffers Take the Lead

During his appearance, Thompson said White House staffers believed they were “the decision makers” in the administration, often acting independently of President Biden. This assertion has sparked questions over who truly wielded influence during Biden’s tenure and whether staffers overstepped their authority.

A second unnamed aide reportedly told Thompson that Biden “just had to win, and then he could disappear for four years,” suggesting a calculated strategy where the president’s aides would “pick up the slack” behind the scenes. The aide further emphasized how, in their view, “when you’re voting for president, you’re voting for the aides around him.” This candid admission sheds light on a dynamic where staffers, rather than the president himself, were perceived as the true drivers of policy and messaging.

These revelations have prompted critics to question the democratic integrity of the administration and whether voters received the leadership they expected. For Biden supporters, it raises uncomfortable questions about transparency and accountability within the White House.

Existential Threat Justification

The heart of the controversy centers on staffers’ belief that President Trump represented an existential threat to American democracy. This mindset, according to Thompson, allowed them to rationalize actions that might otherwise have been considered unacceptable or undemocratic.

As Thompson explained on Fox News Sunday:

If you believe — and I think a lot of these people do sincerely believe — that Donald Trump was and is an existential threat to democracy, you can rationalize anything, including sometimes doing undemocratic things.

For staffers inside the Biden White House, these efforts were seen as necessary to protect the country. However, critics warn that such a mentality risks undermining important democratic norms and could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations.

Supporters of President Trump have seized on these admissions as evidence of wrongdoing and have called for greater scrutiny of the actions taken by Biden’s staff. They argue that justifying “undemocratic things” on the grounds of political necessity is a slippery slope that threatens the foundations of the American system.

President Biden’s Health Adds Turmoil

Amid these revelations, President Biden’s health has also become a topic of national attention. According to a statement released to CNN and CBS, Biden was recently diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer with metastasis to the bone. His office described the cancer as hormone-sensitive, allowing for effective management, but the news has nevertheless heightened concerns about his ability to lead.

The timing of Biden’s diagnosis, coupled with the fresh controversy over staff conduct, has left many Americans wondering about the stability and transparency of the administration. Biden’s family is reportedly reviewing treatment options with his physicians, while the president himself faces mounting pressure both from within his own party and from political opponents.

For those already concerned about aides running the show, Biden’s health struggles add another layer of uncertainty. Critics argue that the combination of an absent president and assertive staffers is a recipe for diminished accountability.

Fallout and Next Steps

Alex Thompson’s revelations have set off a firestorm in Washington as both supporters and critics of President Biden grapple with the implications of staffers openly admitting to “undemocratic things.” The controversy raises questions about who was really in charge during Biden’s presidency and whether the ends truly justified the means for those inside the administration.

Many Republicans are demanding investigations and public accountability, asserting that the American people deserve to know the full extent of staffers’ actions. Meanwhile, Democrats are left to contend with uncomfortable truths about internal decision-making, as well as ongoing concerns over the president’s health.