Obama library costs soar to $850M amid local concerns
Chicago's South Side is home to a towering grey structure that has locals fuming over its ballooning cost and impact. The Obama Foundation Center, meant to honor former President Barack Obama, is now nearing a jaw-dropping $850 million in construction expenses.
According to Breitbart, what started as a $300 million project has spiraled through revisions, hitting $500 million in 2017, $700 million by 2021, and now a figure that could almost touch a billion. This mammoth undertaking in Jackson Park has left many questioning the priorities behind such unchecked spending.
The numbers alone are enough to raise eyebrows, but the fallout on the community adds fuel to the fire. Residents call the building an "eyesore," a stark contrast to its intended legacy, while the financial burden seems to mock fiscal restraint.
Soaring Costs and Lavish Salaries
Foundation executives are hardly scraping by amid this budget explosion. CEO Valerie Jarrett pocketed $740,000 last year, while Robin Cohen, executive vice president, earned over $600,000, and Tina Chen, chief legal officer, took home $425,000.
These salaries stand out as some of the highest among cultural center leadership nationwide. When a project’s price tag inflates by hundreds of millions, such compensation feels like a slap to taxpayers and donors expecting accountability.
Even aesthetic touches, like an 83-foot painted glass window by artist Julie Mehretu, fail to soften the criticism. While the artwork aims to mask the building’s drab exterior, it’s hard to justify embellishments when core costs are already out of control.
Community Pushback and Rising Rents
Chicagoans aren’t just upset about the visuals or the budget; they’re feeling the squeeze in their wallets. Alderwoman Jeannette Taylor, who represents the area, supports Obama but warns of dire consequences for locals.
“We’re going to see rents go higher and we’re going to see families displaced,” Taylor stated bluntly. Her words highlight a bitter irony: a center meant to uplift a community may instead price out its most vulnerable.
She doubled down, noting, “Every time large development comes to communities, they displace the very people they say they want to improve it for.” It’s a pattern that rings true far too often, where grand projects steamroll over the little guy.
DEI Policies Under Fire for Delays
Construction delays, pushing the opening to spring 2026, have also drawn sharp criticism from workers on the ground. Legal challenges and other hurdles slowed progress, but some point fingers at diversity, equity, and inclusion policies for gumming up the works.
A construction foreman vented frustration, saying, “It was all very woke from the time they broke ground in 2021.” He described foundation staffers interrupting work with what he called pointless questions about personal identities, derailing focus from the job at hand.
“They’d ask us silly questions like, are you white, straight, gay, trans, whatever,” the foreman added. When building a near-billion-dollar monument, such distractions seem like a luxury the project can’t afford.
A Legacy Marred by Excess and Disconnect
Despite the controversies, fundraising for the Obama Foundation remains robust, surpassing $1 billion with a $195 million boost last year. Yet, this financial success only deepens the disconnect between the project’s backers and the community bearing its burden.
Chicago residents deserve better than a legacy defined by displacement and unchecked spending. If the goal was to inspire, the center’s story so far feels more like a cautionary tale of overreach.
Ultimately, this isn’t just about a building; it’s about what happens when lofty ideals clash with gritty reality. The Obama Center could still redeem itself, but only if it prioritizes the people it claims to represent over the politics and price tags that have dominated its journey.





