Fifth Circuit to rehear case on Louisiana’s Ten Commandments school display law
A major federal court has thrown new life into Louisiana’s effort to honor America’s moral foundations inside public school classrooms.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has vacated a decision that had previously blocked a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public schools and will now rehear the case en banc, or before the court’s full slate of judges, as The Christian Post reports.
At the heart of the dispute is House Bill 71, signed into law by Governor Jeff Landry in June 2024, mandating that all public school classrooms showcase a copy of the Ten Commandments in a clearly visible 11-by-14-inch format.
Law Critics Argue Violation of Rights
As expected, progressive organizations quickly lined up to oppose the law, forming a coalition to file a legal challenge on behalf of an interfaith group of parents and guardians with children in Louisiana’s public school system.
This coalition includes Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation. Their position? That students viewing a historical moral code on the wall somehow violates the First Amendment.
In June 2025, a three-judge panel from the Fifth Circuit sided with the plaintiffs, upholding a lower court’s injunction and stopping the law’s enforcement, at least temporarily.
Rehearing by Full Court Signals Significance
That ruling was authored by Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, an appointee of President Biden, who argued the law imposed “significant practical harm” to students’ rights and forced them to view the Ten Commandments throughout their education without a way to opt out.
Ramirez framed the law as an overreach, suggesting the mere presence of the Ten Commandments would create an “unwelcome” environment. Apparently, some folks believe that displaying centuries-old moral teachings is more damaging than violent video games and TikTok.
But on Monday, the Fifth Circuit vacated that ruling in a short per curiam opinion, announcing the case will now be reheard by all active judges—an uncommon move that highlights the legal and cultural stakes.
Supporters Defend Traditional Values
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill welcomed the development, stating via WAFB 9, “Glad to see the Fifth Circuit is taking this en banc. Looking forward to those arguments in court.” Many conservatives likely feel the same way—finally, a court is taking seriously the idea that our founding values should be visible in our schools.
At the bill’s original signing, Governor Landry captured the spirit of the legislation clearly: “If you want to respect the rule of law, you’ve got to start from the original law given, which was Moses.” His words echoed a broader philosophy—one that the Constitution doesn’t reject but arguably reflects.
Importantly, House Bill 71 doesn’t just allow for the Ten Commandments. It permits classrooms to post other foundational documents as well, including the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, and the Northwest Ordinance.
Injunction Remains While Case Advances
Despite the vacated ruling, the original district court injunction that halted the law’s enforcement remains in effect for now. That means the Commandments won’t be gracing classroom walls until the appeals process wraps up.
The plaintiffs’ coalition issued a statement saying, “We look forward to presenting our clients’ case to the entire court of appeals.” They also expressed their belief that “constitutional values and principles… will prevail,” seeming to suggest America’s moral compass lies anywhere but Scripture.
The upcoming en banc hearing will offer both sides a chance to restate their arguments, but many see the court’s move to full review as a sign the panel ruling won’t stand unchallenged for much longer.
Case Highlights Clash Between Tradition and Secularism
At its core, this case isn’t just about posters in classrooms—it’s about whether America’s Judeo-Christian heritage has a place in public life. Opponents of the law insist on a rigid reading of the First Amendment that effectively erases that heritage from view.
Supporters, on the other hand, argue that historical context matters, and that teaching children about the documents and values that shaped Western civilization is not only appropriate—it’s essential.
Whether the full Fifth Circuit agrees remains to be seen. But for now, Louisiana gets a second chance to make its case—and perhaps shine a little light from Mount Sinai into the schoolhouse once more.





