Attorney condemns Marine Academy midshipmen as 'Christian nationalist insects' over Jesus painting reaction
A heated dispute has erupted over the placement of a large historic painting at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy.
According to the Christian Post, the restoration and re-display of a large historic Jesus painting has stirred considerable controversy at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy in Kings Point, New York.
The story centers on a painting titled "Christ on the Water" by Hunter A. Wood, originally positioned in a prominent common area at the academy. The artwork, measuring an impressive 10 feet by 19 feet, memorializes sailors lost at sea during World War II. Since its creation, the painting has become a significant emblem within the institution.
The Artwork's Journey From Prominence to Obscurity
During the Biden administration, the painting was moved to the basement following a complaint lodged by Mikey Weinstein, the founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation. Weinstein argued that its prominent display was a case of undue religious influence in a military educational environment. The academy's response was to relegate the painting to a less conspicuous location — the chapel basement.
This decision, however, was not permanent. The notion of restoring the painting to its original location gained momentum under the new administration, particularly following a speech by Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy at the academy's annual Battle Standard Dinner on April 3. Duffy's endorsement of the painting’s restoration was met with resounding applause from the midshipmen, signaling strong support within the student body.
Increasing Tensions and Public Reactions
Mikey Weinstein's reaction to the planned restoration and the public support it received was fierce and uncompromising. In his scathing critique, Weinstein lambasted the midshipmen and Duffy, associating them with Christian nationalism and reactionary political views. He described the midshipmen as "Christian Nationalist insects" in a dramatic denunciation of their actions and attitudes toward the painting's restoration.
The reaction on social media and beyond was split, with Duffy’s supportive remarks for the painting's reinstatement gaining significant traction online, reflected in over 617,000 views of a tweet showcasing his speech.
Student-Led Advocacy and Cultural Debates
In parallel to these developments, midshipmen from the Kings Point Christian Fellowship Club actively petitioned for the painting’s return. They argued that their spiritual and moral well-being was buoyed by the presence of such symbols, asserting that the painting represented universal ideals of sacrifice, love, and empathy – qualities transcending specific religious affiliations.
The Academy has previously faced critiques regarding its stance on various issues, including accusations of adopting "woke" ideologies, notably during debates about its COVID-19 vaccine policies. These arguments reflect broader national discussions about the role of religion and cultural symbolism in public and educational spaces.
A Complex Clash of Values and Visions
Jackson Tolle, a member of the Christian Fellowship Club, commented on the situation by highlighting the spiritual and universal human values represented by Jesus Christ. "Jesus Christ represents ideals... of love, compassion, and empathy; these are ideals and traits that we, as a culture, need to return to," Tolle emphasized.
In contrast, a petition by the midshipmen painted a dire picture of their perceived abandonment by society, with the painting serving as a symbol of steadfast hope and guidance during trying times. They expressed a profound connection to the figure of Jesus Christ, positioning him as an enduring source of support and leadership.
As the debate continues, both sides present compelling arguments about the presence of religious symbols in military educational environments, reflecting a microcosm of the national dialogue on religion, patriotism, and cultural identity in America today. The academy’s ultimate decision on the painting’s placement could signify larger shifts in policy and cultural attitudes within military educational institutions.





