Stephen Colbert’s impending curtain call on The Late Show has laid bare his cozy alliance with Democratic Party elite. On Friday’s Alex Marlow Show, host Alex Marlow, Breitbart’s editor-in-chief, peeled back the layers of Colbert’s role as a late-night propagandist for progressive causes, as the outlet explains. The comedian's exit marks the end of a platform that often felt like a DNC satellite office.

Marlow discussed the conclusion of Colbert’s CBS tenure on his weekday podcast, produced by Breitbart News and Salem Podcast Network. The show, available on YouTube, Rumble, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify, tackled how Colbert’s influence extended beyond comedy into political advocacy.

Colbert’s departure isn’t just a TV host stepping down; it’s a shift in the cultural landscape. Marlow argued that the comedian’s platform was a megaphone for left-wing agendas, a point that resonates with conservatives tired of Hollywood’s lecturing. Yet, one wonders if Colbert’s fans saw him as a jester or a preacher.

Colbert’s establishment role

“He’s a left-wing activist,” Marlow declared, spotlighting Colbert’s go-to status for Democratic heavyweights seeking a friendly interview. This isn’t comedy -- it’s electioneering dressed in a suit and tie. The accusation stings because it’s hard to argue against when you watch the guest lists.

Colbert’s show often hosted Democratic Party darlings, from politicians to activists, with softball questions and canned applause.

Marlow’s critique suggests CBS became a stage for partisan talking points rather than balanced discourse. Conservatives have long suspected late-night TV tilts left, and Colbert’s run seems to confirm it.

The podcast discussion framed Colbert as a linchpin in the Democratic Party establishment. His ability to shape narratives under the guise of humor made him a powerful ally for progressive causes.

It’s a clever trick -- wrap ideology in a laugh, and the audience swallows it whole.

Late-night TV as political platform

Marlow’s show didn’t mince words: Colbert was less a comedian, more a strategist for the left. His platform gave Democrats a polished venue to push their message, unchallenged by tough questions. This dynamic frustrates viewers who crave entertainment over activism.

The Alex Marlow Show is no stranger to calling out perceived media bias. Produced with Salem Podcast Network, it’s a hub for conservative listeners seeking unfiltered takes on cultural shifts. Marlow’s focus on Colbert underscores a broader concern about media’s role in politics.

Colbert’s exit prompts reflection on late-night TV’s evolution into a political battleground. Once a space for lighthearted escapism, shows like his now double as campaign stops. It’s a trend that alienates audiences who just want a break from the news cycle.

Marlow’s resonant critique

Marlow’s commentary hits home for those skeptical of media impartiality. “When the Democrats need a go-to interview, they will go to Stephen Colbert now,” he said. The quote lays bare the cozy relationship between entertainers and political operatives.

That line from Marlow isn’t just a zinger; it’s a wake-up call. Colbert’s role as a Democratic cheerleader raises questions about the blurred lines between entertainment and advocacy.

Conservatives, especially MAGA supporters, see this as another example of cultural institutions tilting left.

Yet, there can still be an empathetic nod to Colbert’s audience. Many tuned in for laughs, not lectures, and may feel betrayed by the shift. It’s a reminder that even well-meaning fans can get caught in the crossfire of agenda-driven programming.

Marlow's counterbalance

The podcast’s availability on multiple platforms amplifies Marlow’s reach to conservative listeners. From YouTube to Spotify, his audience can access sharp critiques of figures like Colbert. It intended to serve as a counterbalance to the mainstream media’s often one-sided narrative.

Colbert’s departure doesn’t erase his influence, but it opens the door for new voices. Marlow’s discussion suggests conservatives should seize this moment to demand fairer representation in media. The fight for cultural relevance is far from over.

Ultimately, Marlow’s take on Colbert’s exit is a call to action. It challenges media consumers to question the motives behind their favorite shows and seek out platforms that align with their values. For conservatives, it’s a rallying cry to reclaim the narrative from the progressive playbook.