A group of advocacy organizations is taking legal action against the state of Colorado over a new law that mandates the use of chosen names and pronouns in public spaces, including schools.

According to the Christian Post, the lawsuit, filed earlier this week, claims the law infringes on First Amendment rights by compelling speech and penalizing individuals who hold traditional views about sex and gender identity.

On Friday, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, a Democrat, signed House Bill 25-1312 into law. Known as the “Kelly Loving Act,” the bill broadens anti-discrimination protections for trans-identifying individuals across the state.

Advocacy Groups Join Forces Against Colorado Legislation

The legal challenge was brought Monday by Defending Education, a national grassroots organization, along with Colorado Parent Advocacy Network, Protect Kids Colorado, Do No Harm, and Dr. Travis Morrell. These plaintiffs argue that the law promotes one set of beliefs at the expense of others.

House Bill 25-1312 amends the state’s anti-discrimination statutes by classifying refusal to use a person’s chosen name or pronouns as discriminatory conduct. Schools are also required to accommodate students’ individual preferences regarding dress codes and name changes for any reason.

The lawsuit contends that Colorado’s existing Anti-Discrimination Act already covers protections for “gender expression.” The plaintiffs argue that the new legislation goes further by forcing individuals to speak in ways that clash with their beliefs.

Doctors Say Law Could Limit Medical Accuracy

Among the challengers is Dr. Travis Morrell, a board-certified dermatologist and dermatopathologist. He asserts that medically precise language is essential for adequate patient care, particularly when addressing cases involving gender dysphoria.

According to the lawsuit, Dr. Morrell routinely discusses various health-related behavior patterns with his patients, including issues tied to gender identity. He believes that being required to adhere to preferred pronouns could compromise his ability to provide accurate medical assessments concerning procedures and treatments.

The legal complaint includes concerns about the physical consequences of gender-affirming care, such as scarring from surgeries or side effects like severe acne resulting from hormone treatments. Dr. Morrell states that discussing these risks requires open and precise communication.

Parents and Educators Cite Free Speech Concerns

The Colorado Parent Advocacy Network, another plaintiff, said the legislation hampers their ability to publish materials reflecting their belief that sex is biologically immutable. The group uses what it calls "biologically accurate pronouns" in its outreach and claims the law restricts free expression.

In the joint lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that the statute is an example of viewpoint-based discrimination. They argue it targets individuals who do not agree with current progressive gender ideologies by making their speech a punishable offense.

Nicki Neily, founder and president of Defending Education, expressed concern over the law’s implications for individual rights. “Citizens cannot be forced to say what the government wants them to say,” Neily stated, adding, “That’s why we have a First Amendment.”

Legislative History and Changes to the Bill

Earlier this year, conservative groups, including the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University, warned that the bill might enable the state to intervene in family matters, such as custody disputes involving transgender minors.

At the time, lawmakers responded by removing sections from the bill that had the potential to impact parental custody rights. Despite that modification, critics maintain that the core of the legislation remains too expansive and ambiguous.

Supporters of the bill argue it affirms the dignity and identity of trans individuals, while opponents believe it compels people to voice views they do not accept, thereby infringing on protected speech.

Governor's Office Has Not Issued Public Comment

As of this report, Gov. Polis’ office has not provided a public response to the lawsuit. The Christian Post reached out for comment but had not received a reply.

The outcome of the lawsuit could influence how states navigate the balance between anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ communities and constitutional rights related to speech and religious freedom.

Legal experts anticipate the case could take months or even years to resolve, with potential implications for similar legislation being introduced in other states across the country.