Shocking claims are surfacing that Jeffrey Epstein may have trafficked more women to Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, once known as the Duke of York, beyond the well-known case of Virginia Giuffre.

As reported by the Daily Mail, the bombshell assertion comes from Congressman Suhas Subramanyam, a member of the House Oversight Committee, as part of a deep dive into the so-called Epstein Files, a probe targeting the late financier’s alleged client list and his notorious sex-trafficking network.

Subramanyam, joined by 15 other Democratic committee members, signed a letter last week demanding that Andrew testify under oath about what he knew of Epstein’s dark dealings.

Epstein’s Shadow Looms Over Andrew

Let’s rewind to the early 2000s—Virginia Giuffre, who tragically took her own life in April, claimed she was trafficked to Andrew for sex three times at age 17, allegations he has consistently denied.

Andrew settled a civil case with Giuffre for a reported 12 million pounds without admitting any wrongdoing, but the stain on his reputation lingers like a bad odor.

Fast forward to August 2010, when The Mail on Sunday revealed Epstein introduced Andrew via email to another woman who had endured years of sexual abuse at Epstein’s hands, though it’s unclear if they ever met in London that month.

New Allegations Stir Old Wounds

Subramanyam isn’t mincing words, declaring, “We have reason to believe that there are others who may have been trafficked to Andrew.”

That’s a gut punch to the notion that this scandal was a one-off, and it raises questions about just how deep Andrew’s ties to Epstein ran—questions many of us on the right have long asked while rejecting the progressive tendency to sweep elite misconduct under the rug.

The congressman also noted, “If he has nothing to hide and did nothing wrong, as he alleges, then he should have no problem coming before us and telling his side,” a challenge that cuts through the nonsense of celebrity privilege (Congressman Suhas Subramanyam).

Congressional Probe Gains Momentum

Yet, a source close to Andrew suggested there’s “not a hope in hell” of him testifying voluntarily, citing the risk of criminal charges—an excuse that smells like evasion to those of us tired of the powerful dodging accountability.

Congress isn’t stopping there; they’re eyeing testimony from Andrew’s former royal protection officers, with one retired officer from a 2010 New York trip ready to talk if called.

Even Sarah Ferguson, Andrew’s ex-wife, might be summoned to speak under oath, while Epstein’s estate has turned over 17,000 financial documents to aid the inquiry just days ago.

Damning Emails and Police Action

Adding fuel to the fire, The Mail on Sunday uncovered an email where Andrew told Epstein, “we’re in this together,” a line included in the recent letter from Congress that makes one wonder just how cozy this relationship was.

Further, revelations that Andrew handed Giuffre’s social security number to a protection officer have sparked a Metropolitan Police investigation, while his conduct is set to be debated by MPs this week for the first time.

Ultimately, this saga isn’t just about one man’s missteps, but about a system that too often lets influence dodge scrutiny. If Congress uncovers more victims or ties, Andrew’s settled past may be just the beginning of a much-needed reckoning for all involved.