Cuellar backs Trump’s National Guard deployment in Los Angeles
Violent protests in Los Angeles forced a rare moment of clarity from a Democrat. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) stunned viewers on NewsNation’s The Hill by backing President Donald Trump’s decision to deploy the National Guard to quell chaos in the city, as Breitbart reports. His support cuts through the usual partisan noise, exposing the left’s blind spot on law and order.
This week, Cuellar endorsed Trump’s move to federalize the National Guard in response to protests that spiraled into car burnings, brick-throwing, and other criminal acts.
Host Blake Burman pressed Cuellar on whether Trump “got this one right.” The congressman didn’t flinch, proving not all Democrats are married to the progressive script.
Protests in Los Angeles started peacefully, as many do. But the mood shifted fast, with agitators torching cars and hurling bricks. This wasn’t free speech -- it was a tantrum that demanded a firm response.
From peaceful to perilous protests
Cuellar, a border-state moderate, knows chaos when he sees it. He told Burman, “If there were a peaceful protest, that would have been one thing.” But the moment flames and flying bricks replaced signs, the game changed.
The congressman’s words dismantle the woke narrative that all protests are sacred. Burning cars isn’t a First Amendment flex -- it’s a crime. Cuellar’s honesty exposes the left’s reluctance to call a spade a spade.
Trump’s decision to deploy the National Guard wasn’t a power grab; it was a necessity. A court ruling confirmed his authority to federalize the Guard. The president acted within the law, despite the usual cries of “tyranny” from the outrage brigade.
Cuellar’s clear-eyed assessment
Cuellar didn’t stop at praising Trump’s call. He added, “The moment we started seeing images of cars being burned and violence… then it changes.” His focus on evidence -- actual footage of destruction -- grounds his stance in reality, not ideology.
The left often paints the National Guard as stormtroopers crushing dissent. Cuellar rejects that caricature, recognizing their role in restoring order. It’s a refreshing break from the dogma that excuses rioters as “misunderstood.”
Burman’s question to Cuellar was pointed: Did Trump get it right? The host seemed surprised when Cuellar doubled down. The exchange revealed a crack in the Democrats’ anti-Trump armor, and it’s worth savoring.
Violence undermining legitimate protest
Cuellar emphasized a key distinction: “I’m for peaceful protests.” He’s not out to silence voices, just the ones breaking windows.
This nuance is lost on those who think “protest” is a blank check for mayhem.
The congressman’s stance aligns with common sense. “When you see that, that’s not good,” he said, pointing to images of fires on Burman’s screen. Most Americans, tired of endless unrest, would nod in agreement.
Los Angeles wasn’t hosting a debate club -- it was a war zone. Cars ablaze and bricks flying aren’t “expression”; they’re threats. Cuellar’s support for the Guard reflects what many quietly believe: Safety trumps sentimentality.
Democrat defies party orthodoxy
Cuellar’s comments are a political earthquake. A Democrat praising Trump? That’s rarer than a balanced news report, and it signals a shift toward pragmatism over party loyalty.
He warned that protests turning “criminal” demand a different response. “Throwing bricks and hammers and burning cars” isn’t activism -- it’s anarchy. Cuellar’s clarity should shame those who equivocate on violence.
Trump’s National Guard deployment, backed by Cuellar and the courts, was a win for order. The left’s reflex to cry foul ignores the wreckage on Los Angeles’ streets.
Sometimes, even a Democrat sees the truth through the smoke.



