Alan Dershowitz, a prominent lawyer and constitutional expert, recently launched a notable critique of the handling of President-elect Donald Trump's hush money trial by Judge Juan Merchan.

In a heated statement, Dershowitz accused Merchan and the Democrats of manipulating the judicial process for political vengeance, targeting Trump with undue severity, as PJ Media reports.

Dershowitz's complaints focus particularly on what he perceives as a deliberate attempt by Merchan to influence the highest court in the United States.

Trump, despite these legal hurdles, remains poised to assume office, underlining an unsuccessful effort by his adversaries to obstruct his presidential claim.

Revisiting Criticism Against Democrats' Actions

The lawyer related the Democrats' fixation on Trump to an extreme obsession, drawing parallels to Captain Ahab's pursuit of the white whale in Moby Dick.

This narrative by Dershowitz suggests that the actions against Trump transcend simple political rivalry, entering the territory of psychological fixation, which he labels as "Trump Derangement Syndrome."

As Trump's presidency approaches, Dershowitz points out the futility of the Democrats' efforts, as their primary objective to prevent him from taking office has faltered.

He alleges that the motivation behind these actions is more aligned with public humiliation rather than upholding justice.

Judicial Influence Alleged in Sentencing Statements

Central to Dershowitz's argument is the claim that Merchan pre-emptively revealed his sentencing decision. According to Dershowitz, this was a strategic move to sway opinions within the U.S. Supreme Court.

He explicitly names justices Roberts and Barrett as among those influenced by this premature announcement, which he describes as an unprecedented and inappropriate judicial maneuver.

This alleged influence is seen as a direct attack on the integrity of the judicial system, a scenario Dershowitz compares to tactics from Alice in Wonderland, highlighting the absurdity and danger of such judicial behavior.

Supreme Court's Role and Trump's Appeal

The apparent division within the Supreme Court regarding the robustness of the case against Trump indicates to Dershowitz that the judicial concerns reach the highest levels of American law. He notes that four justices have shown interest in reviewing the case, suggesting a significant controversy over the legal proceedings.

Dershowitz urges Trump to pursue an appeal, expressing optimism that the Supreme Court will engage with the case and possibly overturn lower court decisions. He views this potential development as crucial not only for Trump but also for the principle of fair judicial review.

The Hunt for a 'Trophy': Merchan's Alleged Motive

Drawing a vivid analogy, Dershowitz accuses Judge Merchan of hunting for a "trophy," symbolized by Trump's defeat in court. This metaphor suggests a perceived personal gain Merchan might seek from ensuring Trump's status as a convicted felon, an outcome Dershowitz vehemently opposes.

In dramatic terms, Dershowitz asserts that Trump is not rightfully a convicted felon, likening any such label to calling a civil rights worker convicted of a minor infraction a felon. This, he argues, is a gross misrepresentation of Trump's legal reality.

Broader Implications on Legal Integrity

Dershowitz's criticism extends beyond Judge Merchan to include Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg. Both are seen as instrumental in what Dershowitz describes as the degradation of the legal system, with political bias tainting the purity of legal proceedings.

Highlighting the urgent need for reforms in the judicial system, Dershowitz argues that the case against Trump showcases a broader issue of politicization within legal ranks, which he believes could undermine public confidence in the judicial system.

As Dershowitz continues to speak out against what he views as judicial and political overreach, his statements challenge the public and legal experts to reconsider the intersection of law and politics in high-profile cases. His advocacy for Trump not only frames the former president as wrongly persecuted but also calls for a reflection on the health of American democracy itself.