FBI recordings link Clinton to foreign donation scandal
Whispers of impropriety have long shadowed the Clinton Foundation, but newly released documents show the FBI had hard evidence of questionable foreign donations while Hillary Clinton shaped U.S. foreign policy.
According to the Daily Caller, the revelations, detailed in documents provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee, expose a recorded conversation between Clinton and Indian hotel magnate Sant Singh Chatwal. In it, they discussed donations to the foundation and her lingering 2008 campaign debt.
The FBI's New York field office, under Assistant Director Diego Rodriguez, pushed for Clinton to face direct questions about potential pay-to-play schemes. Yet, when she sat for an interview in July 2016 on a separate email server probe, headquarters in Washington stayed silent on the foundation’s dealings.
Unanswered Questions on Foreign Influence
Chatwal, a longtime Clinton ally and foundation trustee, pleaded guilty in 2014 to laundering straw donations for her 2008 campaign. His own words to an FBI informant, “That’s the only way to buy them, get into the system,” paint a damning picture of transactional politics.
Investigators had evidence suggesting Chatwal’s influence extended beyond campaign funds, possibly touching a 2008 Indo-U.S. nuclear deal that eased restrictions on India. His boast to Indian media, “Even my close friend Hillary Clinton was not in favor of the deal, but when I put the whole package together, she also came on board,” raises sharp questions about money’s role in policy.
The FBI’s “Cracked Foundation” probe sought to ask Clinton if Chatwal funneled large cash payments to Indian officials to secure that nuclear agreement. Such a scheme, if true, would shred any claim of impartial diplomacy during her tenure as secretary of state.
Broken Pledges and Hidden Funds
Clinton had promised the Obama administration that the foundation would halt foreign donations while she served as America’s top diplomat. Despite this, agents found the charity continued accepting undisclosed contributions from nations where she conducted State Department business.
A second entity, the Clinton Guistra Sustainable Growth Initiative, emerged soon after her pledge to disclose all foundation donors. Funds raised by this group often flowed to the foundation without any transparency, leaving the public blind to potential conflicts.
Agents wanted to press Clinton on how many times her foundation had ignored the agreement with the Obama administration. They also sought clarity on the funding sources for this secondary initiative and the foreign governments possibly bankrolling it.
Washington’s Deafening Silence
When field agents urged a deeper dive into these murky ties, FBI headquarters slammed the door shut. An Eastern District of New York assistant U.S. attorney later vented frustration, saying in 2019, “We were trying to explore the Foundation, and we were told ‘NO’ by FBI HQ.”
This refusal to pursue leads reeks of political protectionism, especially given Clinton’s clout in Washington circles. Taxpayers deserve to know if decisions affecting national security were swayed by foreign cash rather than public interest.
The timing of this inaction, under an administration that had elevated Clinton after a bitter primary, only deepens the suspicion. A charity meant to serve global good shouldn’t double as a backdoor for influence peddling.
A Call for Accountability
These documents lay bare a troubling pattern of dodged scrutiny and broken promises. If foreign donors like Chatwal could buy access while Clinton held the reins of American diplomacy, the integrity of our institutions takes a heavy hit.
The FBI’s failure to follow through isn’t just a missed opportunity; it’s a betrayal of trust in a system already strained by perceptions of elitist favoritism. Field agents saw the red flags, but headquarters chose to look away, leaving critical questions unanswered.
Public faith won’t be restored by sweeping this under the rug. It’s time for a hard look at how power and money intertwine, ensuring no one, no matter their connections, stands above the rules.



