BY Joe Saunders, The Western JournalMay 29, 2023
4 months ago

Feinstein Struggling with Basic Senate Tasks, Reportedly Confused on Vice President's Role in Chamber

When even The New York Times is blowing the whistle on a Democratic lawmaker, the rest of the country should be listening.

The reliably liberal newspaper has built a readership on running interference for Democrats who get in trouble -- most famously for covering up the self-evident corruption of the Joe Biden presidency.

So when it publishes a damning piece that basically accuses a prominent senator of operating as a puppet for her staff, it's a good chance the situation is even worse for the American public.

A lengthy article by Times congressional correspondent Annie Karni published Monday describes what amounts to an influential lawmaker who is utterly dependent on unelected staff members.

The lawmaker is California Sen. Dianne Feinstein. And it's a picture no American should accept.

"They push her wheelchair, remind her how and when she should vote and step in to explain what is happening when she grows confused," Karni wrote.

They "remind" her how to vote? That's a polite way of saying the men and women around Feinstein -- not the senator herself -- are making decisions about the country's tax money, its national defense, its border security and the countless other issues federal lawmakers have in front of them.

And as far as a staff that needs to "step in to explain what is happening when she grows confused," that sounds like it happens a good deal more than even Democrats who support the doddering Biden in the White House should be comfortable with.

In one case the Times report described, Feinstein didn't understand why Vice President Kamala Harris had returned to the upper chamber to cast a tie-breaking vote.

"What is she doing here?" the senator asked.

While conservatives might have the same question in a broad sense -- what is Harris doing in the vice presidency anyway? -- the context shows Feinstein, a veteran of the Senate since 1992, didn't remember that a basic rule of the body is that a tie vote can only be broken by the vice president.

It's the kind of thing you'd think might stick after 30 years or so.

There's more -- like how staffers try to shield Feinstein from reporters and photographers and how her office runs essentially on autopilot.

But all of it is haunting -- and considering it's The New York Times essentially attacking its own political party, it's illuminating in illustrating not only Feinstein's problems but the Times' choice of targets.

Democrats have a one-vote majority in the Senate now, thanks to 48 Democratic senators and three independents who caucus with the Democrats (Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Maine Sen. Angus King and Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema).

One of those Democratic votes is Pennsylvania's John Fetterman, a man still clearly debilitated from a stroke he suffered in May 2022 (yet who somehow still got elected, bless those Pennsylvania Democrats).

Another, of course, is Feinstein -- a woman who all evidence suggests is completely incapable of fulfilling the duties of a United States senator.

Sensible Americans wouldn't trust either one to boil water without worrying about the house burning down, but they essentially comprise the Democratic majority in the upper chamber of Congress.

The Times hasn't gotten around to an honest appraisal of Fetterman yet -- a piece Karni wrote in March took on a noticeably upbeat, cheerful tone, considering her subject was in hospital being treated for clinical depression.

In all likelihood, that's because Pennsylvania is a battleground state -- Fetterman might have lost had the Republican candidate not been television celebrity Dr. Mehmet Oz -- while solidly blue California is a safe seat for Democrats regardless of who is running.

(It's so safe that even a parasitic leach such as Rep. Adam Schiff is a virtual lock to win it on Feinstein's retirement if he wins the Democratic primary.)

The Times can come clean safely about Feinstein knowing full well that her presence or absence won't change the balance of power in the Senate. (It would just make her staff a good deal less powerful.)

So the so-called newspaper of record doesn't get any props for committing journalism when it comes to Feinstein.

From a political point of view, it's a wash.

But it's still worth paying attention to for the rest of the country. Because when the Times is sticking a fork in a Democratic lawmaker, it means she's done.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Written by: Joe Saunders, The Western Journal



Blinken admits Obama was wrong about Russia

Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently revealed that former President Barack Obama's stance on Russia in the 2012 presidential debate was misplaced. In a surprising…
13 hours ago
 • By Staff Writers

Trump campaign says GOP debates are ‘boring’, calls for cancellation of remaining debates

Donald Trump’s campaign has voiced its dissatisfaction with the GOP primary debates, labeling them as 'boring' and 'inconsequential' and has urged for their discontinuation. In…
13 hours ago
 • By Staff Writers

Award-winning guitarist Al Di Meola has heart attack on stage

Famous guitarist Al Di Meola, 69, stumbled off a Bucharest stage on Wednesday, and later revealed that he’d had a heart attack mid-show. Al Di…
13 hours ago
 • By Staff Writers

Biden Admin confirms historic crackdown on offshore oil and gas drilling

The Biden administration has released one of the most restrictive five-year leasing programs in history. For those concerned about the future of energy in the…
13 hours ago
 • By Staff Writers

Woke Top General Mark Milley is retiring

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley is retiring after a chaotic stint in office. Mark Milley, who served as the top US…
13 hours ago
 • By Staff Writers


We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:



    Get news from American Digest in your inbox.

      By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
      Scelerisque volutpat pellentesque sed ornare egestas. Urna, cursus enim, faucibus tellus amet dignissim imperdiet ut.