Focus on the Family begins nationwide search for next president as Jim Daly prepares to hand off leadership
Jim Daly, the man who has led Focus on the Family for more than two decades, announced this week that the Colorado Springs, based ministry has officially launched a nationwide search for its next president, setting in motion a succession process he wants to complete before the organization's 50th anniversary in 2027.
The search, conducted with executive recruiting firm FaithSearch Partners, marks the beginning of a transition Daly says he has been planning for years. Candidates can begin applying immediately. The process is expected to take twelve to eighteen months and will conclude with a vote by the ministry's board of directors.
It is a rare thing in American Evangelical life: a major institutional leader stepping aside on his own terms, with no scandal, no financial crisis, and no board revolt forcing his hand. Daly, approaching 65, told The Christian Post that he wants to bring in younger leadership capable of speaking to a new generation of families.
"My core belief was it's good to get new faces, new energy, younger leadership in to kind of speak to the 30-, 40-somethings now about what they're facing with marriage and parenting. I'm going to be turning 65 here. It's time to start looking for the next-gen leadership. That's really the goal, and to do it well is the other goal."
That last phrase, "to do it well", is not a throwaway line. It points to a chapter of Focus on the Family's history that Daly clearly wants to avoid repeating.
Lessons from the founder transition
Dr. James Dobson founded Focus on the Family in 1977 and built it into one of the most influential Evangelical institutions in America. But the handoff from founder to successor was not smooth. Daly took over as president in 2005, and Dobson's full departure from the organization stretched over several more years.
Dobson resigned as president in 2003 and later stepped down as chairman of the board. He finally agreed to cut all formal ties with the ministry, including his role hosting the flagship radio broadcast, at the end of February 2010, more than half a decade after the succession nominally began.
Even Dobson acknowledged the difficulty. "One of the common errors of founder-presidents is to hold to the reins of leadership too long, thereby preventing the next generation from being prepared for executive authority," Dobson said at the time. Daly, for his part, praised Dobson's tenure but clearly took notes on what went wrong.
"So many transitions don't go well. We had some difficulty in the founder transition, even at Focus with Dr. Dobson, and I took a lot of notes and thought, 'When it's my turn... I want to make sure I do it as best as I can.' Christians should be leading the way on how to do this well."
That sentiment, that Christian organizations ought to model excellence in leadership transitions rather than bungle them, runs throughout Daly's public comments on the search. It is a conviction that carries weight in a landscape where pastoral departures often arrive under far less orderly circumstances.
An organization in stable condition
Daly went out of his way to emphasize that the transition is not born of crisis. Focus on the Family employs roughly 750 people, operates 13 international offices, and oversees an annual budget of approximately $150 million. Its flagship radio program reaches about six million listeners.
"There is no crisis, which is wonderful. We're not under any kind of situation of moral collapse or any other thing. Finances are good at Focus.... If I were coming in as the next leader, it's the kind of situation I'd want to walk into, where things are going well."
That framing matters. In an era when institutional trust, inside and outside the church, runs low, Daly is making the case that voluntary, planned succession from a position of strength is the healthiest model. The board has even asked him to consider staying involved in donor relations and fundraising during his successor's first year, a signal that the transition is designed to be gradual rather than abrupt.
The contrast with how many large organizations handle leadership change is hard to miss. Whether in corporate boardrooms, military commands, or religious institutions, transitions often happen reactively, triggered by scandal, political pressure, or internal collapse. When senior leaders in other fields step down, the circumstances are frequently contentious. Daly is betting that doing it proactively will pay dividends for the ministry's long-term health.
What Daly built, and what the next leader inherits
Daly's tenure has been defined less by the culture-war combativeness that marked the Dobson era and more by what Daly describes as the "orthopraxy" of the faith, putting beliefs into practice through direct ministry. He expanded Focus on the Family's foster care and adoption programs, launched a respite care initiative for families in crisis, funded ultrasound technology for pregnancy resource centers, and developed the Highly Capable Kids curriculum.
A foster child himself, Daly has spoken openly about how his background shaped his priorities.
"I was a foster child, so that was born out of that pain and that experience that I had."
He described Dobson as "more of a prophet" and positioned his own approach as more relational, focused on meeting families where they are, including families that don't share the ministry's convictions. That posture has occasionally drawn skepticism from the right flank of Evangelicalism, but Daly frames it as fidelity to the Gospel rather than compromise.
"I just see the potential in people. I feel like that's close to God's heart. That's what Christ communicated to us.... Not that we waver on principle or truth, but be interested in the lives of other people that don't know the Lord."
The organization's core doctrinal positions, however, have not shifted. Focus on the Family continues to affirm marriage as between one man and one woman and holds that children thrive best with both a mother and a father. And the demand for the ministry's counsel on these issues is growing in ways that reflect the cultural moment.
Rising demand on LGBTQ issues
One of the most telling data points Daly shared involves the nature of the calls Focus on the Family receives from families seeking help. LGBTQ-related issues, he said, have surged dramatically in the ministry's counseling request rankings.
"LGBTQ issues particularly would have ranked down in 16, 17, 18 in years past. Now they've ranked No. 4, 5, 6 of the phone call types that we're getting for help."
That shift speaks to the pressures families across the country face as gender ideology and sexual identity questions move from the margins of public life into schools, medical offices, and kitchen-table conversations. For a ministry that serves millions, the spike in calls is a leading indicator of where the next leader will need to be both theologically grounded and pastorally equipped.
It is also a reminder that the cultural headwinds facing organizations like Focus on the Family are intensifying, not easing. Religious institutions of all kinds are navigating questions about how to hold doctrinal positions while engaging a culture that increasingly treats those positions as hostile. The recent appointment of new leadership at the Vatican's communications office reflects a similar awareness across Christian traditions that institutional messaging must adapt even when doctrine does not.
What Daly wants in a successor
Daly outlined the qualities he hopes the board will prioritize. The wish list is less about credentials and more about character and conviction.
"We're looking for someone who is true to those biblical principles that Focus started on almost 50 years ago. Even if the culture is blowing hard at what we believe, staying true to that, calm, kind, loving."
He also stressed that the incoming leader should not try to replicate his style, or Dobson's. "I'd really encourage the next person not to try to be me. You've got to be who you are," Daly said. He added that the outgoing leader bears responsibility for setting the right tone: "The outgoing person really sets the tone. To make it healthy, I think deference is critical."
That kind of self-awareness is not always present in leadership transitions, particularly in organizations built around a single charismatic figure. Dobson's shadow loomed large over Daly's early years. Daly is trying to ensure his own shadow does not loom over the next president's.
The stakes extend beyond Focus on the Family's internal operations. As one of the largest and most visible Evangelical ministries in the country, the organization's choice of leader will send a signal about the direction of mainstream conservative Christianity, whether it leans more toward the prophetic confrontation of the Dobson model or the relational engagement Daly has championed.
A test for Christian institutions
Daly framed the transition in terms that go beyond his own organization. He sees it as a test case for whether Christian institutions can outperform their secular counterparts in something as fundamental as handing off power.
"It's actually quite troubling to me that we can talk a good game as Christians and talk about very important things. But if we fundamentally can't do these kinds of things, like transition better than secular businesses transition, then it kind of diminishes our witness."
He added: "I'm very determined to want to demonstrate this in a way that people go, 'Wow, that was really well done.'"
The track record of high-profile Christian leadership transitions in recent years has been uneven at best. From megachurch pastoral successions that ended in acrimony to denominational disputes that spilled into public view, the pattern has too often been one of dysfunction. The failures of prominent Christian figures in other contexts only heighten the importance of getting institutional governance right.
Daly's approach, planned, transparent, conducted from a position of financial and organizational strength, is the exception, not the rule. Whether the board finds the right successor remains to be seen. The applicant pool has only just opened, and the specific criteria beyond doctrinal fidelity and generational relevance have not been made public.
But the process itself is worth watching. If the man who grew up in foster care and spent twenty-one years building a ministry that serves six million listeners can walk away cleanly and hand the keys to someone equipped for the next chapter, it will be a model worth studying, and not just for Christian organizations.
In a culture that rewards spectacle and punishes restraint, a quiet, well-managed transition might be the most countercultural thing Focus on the Family has done in years.






