A comprehensive 78-page interim report released by multiple House committees has stirred significant controversy. It alleges political interference by the Biden administration in the Justice Department's investigation of Hunter Biden.

This report could potentially lead to the drafting of articles of impeachment against the president.

The joint investigation, undertaken by the House Judiciary, Ways and Means, and Oversight Committees, delved deep into the Justice Department's five-year probe. Their findings were compiled in a document released on Tuesday.

Testimonies and Allegations Raise Concerns

Central to the committees' concerns are testimonies from Department of Justice (DOJ) officials and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblowers. They highlighted alleged deviations in the investigation process.

IRS agents have come forward with claims of political interference from appointees of President Biden, a charge that administration officials have staunchly denied. The report delves into these allegations, scrutinizing the actions of those involved in the probe.

One of the most glaring assertions is that the DOJ prevented the filing of more substantial charges against Hunter Biden on two separate occasions. This has raised questions about the integrity and independence of the investigation.

Questions Surrounding DOJ's Decisions

The report critically examines the role of Attorney General Merrick Garland, who long refused to appoint a special counsel for the Hunter Biden investigation. This decision has come under fire, with critics arguing it reflects a conflict of interest.

Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) Lesley Wolf's actions are also under scrutiny. Wolf reportedly limited questioning regarding references to "the big guy" in the evidence, a term speculated to be linked to Joe Biden.

Moreover, the report claims Wolf advised against searching Biden's Delaware guest house, citing concerns over the "optics" it might create. This decision has sparked debate over whether investigative actions were influenced by considerations other than the law.

Scrutiny Over Hunter Biden's Financial Dealings

Another striking revelation in the report concerns Hunter Biden's financial interactions. It alleges that he demanded payment from a Chinese businessman while in the company of Joe Biden. This incident has raised questions about the possible involvement of the former Vice President in his son's dealings.

The investigators, as per the report, sought location data to confirm whether Joe Biden was present during these interactions. This aspect of the investigation points to an attempt to establish a direct link between the former vice president and his son's business affairs.

Furthermore, the report details that Hunter Biden allegedly deducted payments to prostitutes and sex clubs from his taxes. This revelation adds a salacious aspect to the investigation, casting a shadow over Hunter Biden's financial ethics and legality.

Origins of the Hunter Biden Probe

The origin of the Hunter Biden probe, as outlined in the report, began with an inquiry into a foreign adult website. This inquiry eventually expanded into a larger investigation, encompassing various aspects of Hunter Biden's financial and personal conduct.

As the investigation progressed, it increasingly pointed towards potential political interference and deviations from standard DOJ practices. These allegations, if proven, could have significant implications for the Biden administration.

The report's findings are now propelling Congressional committees to consider serious actions. They are gathering evidence to determine if there are sufficient grounds to draft articles of impeachment against President Biden for consideration by the full House of Representatives.

Conclusion

The interim report by the House committees casts a long shadow over the Justice Department's investigation of Hunter Biden. It raises serious questions about political interference and the integrity of the legal process. The findings suggest a complex web of political and personal interests potentially influencing the course of justice.

• A joint release of a 78-page report by House committees alleging political interference in the Hunter Biden probe.
• Testimonies from DOJ officials and IRS whistleblowers point to potential deviations and political influence.
• Refusal by AG Merrick Garland to appoint a special counsel and decisions by AUSA Lesley Wolf questioned.
• Allegations of Hunter Biden's financial misconduct and possible links to Joe Biden.
• Congressional committees are considering drafting articles of impeachment against President Biden.