BY Benjamin ClarkJuly 27, 2024
6 months ago
BY 
 | July 27, 2024
6 months ago

Kamala Harris Faces Scrutiny Over Past Immigration Remarks

In the thick of election season, presumptive Democratic Party nominee Kamala Harris has stirred robust debate with her standpoint on undocumented immigrants and criminality, pulling sharp rebuttals, especially from Republican quarters.

Harris's prior assertion that undocumented immigrants are not criminals has ignited a fierce critique from former Trump administration ICE official Jon Feere, as Breitbart reports.

Over the past years, even more so with more recent remarks, Harris has consistently held that "an undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.”

This specific viewpoint has been amplified and criticized by the Republican National Committee. Members argue, alongside several conservative figures, that her stance is lenient and indicative of her approach toward immigration enforcement.

Legal Interpretations Conflict Over Immigration

Jon Feere, who had significant roles within ICE during Donald Trump’s presidency, strongly disagrees with Harris. He cites U.S. law, particularly statute 8 U.S.C. § 1325, to make his point. This statute outlines penalties for improper entry into the United States -- categorized clearly as crimes including illegal entry and deceit related to U.S. borders.

Feere’s argument extends beyond the technicalities of illegal entry. He warns of non-immigration-related illicit activities such as identity theft, social security fraud, and tax evasion, purportedly committed by many undocumented immigrants.

These activities, Feere claims, affect U.S. citizens directly, creating real victims and substantial social and economic repercussions.

The Wide Economic Impact of Immigration Policies

Over the past three years, approximately 10 million people have migrated to the U.S., according to policies enacted by the current Democratic administration under President Joe Biden.

This surge, Feere points out, is not without consequences. He claims it has depressed wages, inflated housing costs, and diverted funds from investments -- all these dans le cadre of burgeoning rates of illegal immigration.

Critics argue that the administration’s lax enforcement of immigration laws exacerbates these issues. They fear that a Harris presidency would perpetuate, if not aggravate, what they deem as negligence. This concern pivots on the premise that inadequate enforcement essentially invites law-breaking.

The Role of the Executive in Immigration Enforcement

Feere’s frustration is palpable as he discusses the role of the Executive Branch in upholding law and order. "What she’s ultimately saying is that illegal immigration is not a crime … [but] the statute says it is a crime, so she’s wrong,” he claims. He underscores the need for the Executive to hold lawbreakers accountable, suggesting that Harris’s stance reflects an unwillingness to perform this fundamental duty.

"Are [illegal migrants] lawbreakers or are they not? The answer is yes, and the Executive Branch’s job is to hold them accountable for breaking laws,” Feere adds. He further criticizes Harris for her perceived reluctance to enforce federal laws rigorously, questioning her suitability for a role in the Executive Branch.

Feere's polemic extends to the broader implications of Harris's stance on governance. "It means that she has abandoned a huge section of federal law, at which point we have to wonder whether our form of government is capable of withstanding such a radical individual,” he asserts.

Tensions Over Terminology and Legal Responsibilities

The discourse centers not only on the facts but the interpretation and application of the term "criminal." By not categorizing unauthorized migrants under this label, Harris has sparked a contentious debate on whether this constitutes a dereliction of duty or a compassionate, pragmatic approach to a complex issue.

As the election looms closer, these debates are likely to intensify, reflecting deep divides not only about the specifics of legislation like 8 U.S.C. § 1325 but broader questions about America’s identity, values, and future.

In conclusion, Harris's comments highlight a pivotal issue in American politics, namely, the balance between law enforcement and humanitarian concerns in immigration policy.

Feere’s criticisms encapsulate a significant opposition viewpoint that champions stringent legal adherence and questions the broader implications of perceived leniency.

How this will impact the upcoming elections remains a critical point of observation.

Written by: Benjamin Clark

NATIONAL NEWS

SEE ALL

Powerful healing reminder in Michael Reagan's reflections

In a poignant commentary on the current state of U.S. politics, Michael Reagan, the son of former President Ronald Reagan, calls for a return to…
6 hours ago
 • By Benjamin Clark

JD Vance claims the U.S. has distorted religious freedom efforts

Vice President J.D. Vance delivered critical remarks about past U.S. policies on religious liberty at the International Religious Freedom 2025 Summit. According to the Christian…
6 hours ago
 • By Benjamin Clark

Revealing Kamala Harris' unedited CBS interview and the focus on Donald Trump's claims

A bombshell revelation exposes multiple segments omitted from Vice President Kamala Harris's controversial 60 Minutes interview. According to Daily Mail, the Federal Communications Commission ordered…
12 hours ago
 • By Benjamin Clark

Argentina announces withdrawal from World Health Organization, citing deep policy differences

Right-wing President Javier Milei takes a controversial stance against international cooperation as Argentina prepares for major policy shifts. According to Euronews, Argentina will withdraw from…
12 hours ago
 • By Benjamin Clark

Schumer's legal scrutiny for supreme court justice threats examined

A new investigation targets Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's controversial statements made against Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during a pro-abortion rally…
12 hours ago
 • By Benjamin Clark

DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

    LATEST NEWS

    Newsletter

    Get news from American Digest in your inbox.

      By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: American Digest, 3000 S. Hulen Street, Ste 124 #1064, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, US, http://americandigest.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
      Christian News Alerts is a conservative Christian publication. Share our articles to help spread the word.
      © 2025 - CHRISTIAN NEWS ALERTS - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
      magnifier