Vice President Kamala Harris has signaled a bold shift in judicial reform agendas during a recent CNN town hall.

In her proposal, Harris voiced robust support for expanding the U.S. Supreme Court to 12 justices as part of a broader reform strategy touted by many on the left, removing herself from those who advise caution when it comes to such major transformation, as Townhall.com reports.

During the Wednesday night event, Harris discussed various significant reforms aimed at reshaping the political landscape. Her remarks included not only the potential changes to the Supreme Court, but also other crucial alterations aimed at forwarding the Democratic agenda.

The vice president revealed that the expansion of the Supreme Court, which currently holds nine justices, involves increasing the number to twelve. According to Harris, this change is crucial in restoring public trust in the judicial system, which she claims is waning among the American people.

Harris Advocates for Larger Supreme Court

"I do believe there should be some kind of reform to the Court," stated Harris during the town hall, suggesting that the current structure does not meet the demands of justice perceived by the public.

Her commitment to this drastic step highlights a significant pivot in her approach to governance, should she attain the presidency.

Harris explicated that expanding the Court would mitigate issues stemming from its perceived partisanship, which, according to her remarks, contributes to a cloud of distrust overshadowing its decisions.

This statement sparked various reactions from different political spectrums, reflecting on the longstanding debate over the role and composition of the judiciary.

This judicial reform was not the only point of contention. The vice president also took a firm stand on another procedural aspect hindering the legislative process.

Eliminating the Senate Filibuster

Harris articulated a decisive stance on the Senate filibuster -- a legislative tool often used to delay or block voting on a bill by prolonging the debate. She advocated for its removal, framing it as an impediment to legislative efficiency and a barrier to significant Democratic initiatives.

"If elected, I pledge to eliminate the filibuster to expedite our agenda," Harris conveyed, emphasizing the urgency of implementing the changes envisioned by her administration. This move would potentially allow for swifter legislative actions but also stir significant concern among those wary of single-party dominance.

With these proposed reforms, Harris aims to address what she described as a legislative and judicial system that currently hampers progressive changes. Her bold assertions about the erosion of public confidence in the Supreme Court were particularly poignant, though they have been met with skepticism and requests for empirical evidence.

Public Reaction and Political Implications

Feedback from the public and political analysts was immediate and mixed. Supporters of Harris view these proposals as necessary for modernizing and depoliticizing governance, while critics accuse her of seeking undue power over American democratic institutions.

The implications of such reforms on the American political and judicial landscape are profound. Expanding the Supreme Court and removing the filibuster could realign legislative and judicial balances, potentially impacting future government policies significantly.

As the debate over these controversial reforms unfolds, the political community remains split. Advocates argue that these changes are overdue corrections to systemic stagnation and partisanship, whereas detractors see them as radical shifts that could undermine the foundational principles of American democracy.

Prospects of Democratic Reforms Under Harris

Moving forward, the discourse surrounding these topics is expected to intensify as more details emerge and the ramifications of such reforms are further debated. The alignment or opposition within Harris' party could also play a critical role in the feasibility of her proposals seeing legislative daylight.

The potential expansion of the Supreme Court and removal of the filibuster underscore a broader strategy by Harris to redefine the role of both legislative and judicial branches in U.S. governance. By advocating for these changes, Harris positions herself at the forefront of a contentious but seminal pivot in U.S. political reformism.

In conclusion, Vice President Kamala Harris's propositions during the CNN town hall outline her as a transformative figure willing to challenge the status quo. Her advocacy for expanding the Supreme Court to 12 justices and eliminating the Senate filibuster highlight her vision for a more dynamic, responsive governance structure designed to bolster Democratic initiatives and restore confidence in U.S. democratic institutions.