Mother Jones editor faces backlash for targeting Vance's kids
Disneyland, the happiest place on Earth, turned into a battleground of political spite over the weekend. Vice President JD Vance and his young family faced public heckling during what should have been a joyful outing.
According to Daily Mail, Clara Jeffrey, editor-in-chief of the progressive outlet Mother Jones, took to the X alternative BlueSky to justify the booing of Vance’s children, aged 3, 5, and 8. Her comments have sparked a firestorm of criticism for targeting kids in a political feud.
Jeffrey wrote, "People who feel bad for JD Vance's kids as family gets booed at Disneyland. I get it, but better those kids know now what their father is about." This cold take suggests children should bear the brunt of adult disagreements, a stance that’s hard to stomach when family moments are weaponized.
Dragging Kids Into Political Crossfire
Jeffrey doubled down, claiming, "Other kids are watching their parents get shipped off to gulags," implying some twisted moral equivalence. But equating a theme park incident to systemic oppression is a stretch that trivializes real suffering while excusing petty harassment.
She further speculated that Vance orchestrated the outing for political optics, suggesting he wanted his family booed to gain sympathy. This cynical view assumes a father would exploit his children’s humiliation for gain, a leap that reveals more about the accuser’s mindset than Vance’s motives.
The incident itself saw Vance, his wife Usha, and their three young children navigating Disneyland amid jeers from strangers. With about 50 Secret Service agents in tow, the family outing was anything but private, yet targeting kids for their father’s politics crosses a clear line.
Public Backlash Cuts Across Party Lines
Criticism of Jeffrey’s remarks came swiftly, uniting voices from various political corners. Donald Trump Jr. posted on X, "WTF is wrong with these people!???" capturing the raw frustration many felt over dragging children into this mess.
Republican strategist Andrew Surabian called Jeffrey out as a "soulless ghoul" for seemingly endorsing harassment of kids so young. While the language is sharp, it reflects a broader disgust with using minors as pawns in ideological battles.
Even self-described left-leaning individuals pushed back against Jeffrey’s stance. Armand Domalewski noted on X, "Respectfully, I'm a pretty left leaning guy and I wish folks a blessed day fairly often. It's just a nice thing to say," highlighting how her approach alienates even potential allies.
Past Controversies Resurface for Jeffrey
Jeffrey is no stranger to public scrutiny, having previously drawn ire for criticizing an Alaska Air flight attendant who wished passengers a "blessed night." She labeled the phrase as akin to "creeping Christian nationalism," a charge that struck many as overblown and disconnected from everyday kindness.
That incident, which unfolded last year after a landing in San Francisco, saw her mocked online for pettiness. Critics unearthed old posts where she herself used "blessed," exposing a hypocrisy that undercuts her moral posturing.
Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen responded then with, "How sad and impoverished is your life that you're offended by someone blessing you?" It’s a fair jab at a mindset that seems to hunt for grievances in harmless gestures, much like her latest comments on Vance’s family.
Family Values Should Trump Political Games
At the heart of this uproar is a simple truth: children shouldn’t be collateral damage in political warfare. Vance’s policies or public role can be debated fiercely, but his kids deserve to enjoy a day at Disneyland without becoming targets.
The progressive agenda often claims to champion compassion, yet Jeffrey’s words show a glaring blind spot when personal animus takes over. Her defense of booing a family outing isn’t just tone-deaf; it’s a betrayal of the very empathy she might preach.
Let’s hope this serves as a wake-up call to keep political battles among adults. Families, especially young children, should remain off-limits, no matter how heated the cultural divide grows.




