Nancy Mace says Hillary Clinton was 'screaming' and 'unhinged' during closed-door Epstein deposition
Hillary Clinton lost control during a closed-door deposition on Thursday when Rep. Nancy Mace pressed her about racy photos of Bill Clinton found in the Jeffrey Epstein files, according to the South Carolina Republican.
Mace told reporters that Clinton's composure shattered the moment the questions turned to her husband's connection to the late sex offender.
"She was screaming. She was unhinged. I hope that President Clinton is less unhinged today than his wife was yesterday."
The deposition, conducted in Chappaqua, New York, on February 26, came as part of the House Oversight Committee's ongoing examination of the Department of Justice's mass release of Epstein-related files. Oversight Chairman James Comer said the American public won't have to take anyone's word for what happened behind closed doors.
"We're going to get the video out quickly."
Comer added that the footage could come out as soon as Friday afternoon, ahead of Bill Clinton's own scheduled testimony.
Clinton's counter-narrative
Hillary Clinton wasted no time framing the entire proceeding as a political stunt. Speaking to reporters in New York on Thursday, she dismissed the deposition as "partisan political theater" and insisted she cooperated fully.
"I don't know how many times I had to say, 'I did not know Jeffrey Epstein.'"
She also claimed she "answered every one of their questions as fully as I could based on what I knew." When Mace confronted her about the photos during the deposition, Clinton reportedly fired back with a curt response: "We're not here to discuss my feelings."
Clinton also complained that Republican lawmakers asked her about UFOs and the "debunked Pizzagate conspiracy theory," an attempt to paint the entire proceeding as unserious. It's a familiar playbook. When the questions get uncomfortable, attack the questioners, as New York Post reports.
Her spokesman, Nick Merrill, took to social media to dispute Mace's characterization directly.
"You made something up. I corrected you. You can become unglued all you want today, just tell the truth."
That's a bold line from the communications team of a woman whose husband appeared in photos recovered from the estate of a convicted sex offender.
The video will settle it
Here's what matters: there is a recording. The back-and-forth between Mace's account and Clinton's denial has a shelf life, and it expires the moment Comer releases the footage.
Comer was unequivocal about that.
"The American people will see it."
Either Clinton maintained her composure under pressure, and Mace is exaggerating, or a former Secretary of State came unglued when asked straightforward questions about photographs connected to the most notorious sex trafficking case in modern American history. One of those two things is true, and the tape exists.
The Clinton orbit has spent decades perfecting the art of discrediting the process whenever the process gets too close. Investigations become "witch hunts." Depositions become "theater." Questions become "conspiracies." The pattern is so consistent that it barely requires commentary at this point.
What the deposition really exposed
Set aside the theatrics for a moment. The core fact remains: racy photos of Bill Clinton surfaced from the Epstein files, and when his wife was asked about them under oath, the result was, at minimum, a heated exchange that both sides now characterize very differently.
Clinton wants this to be about Republican overreach. She wants reporters to focus on UFO questions and Pizzagate references so the Epstein connection gets buried under a pile of "look how unserious they are" coverage. It's misdirection dressed up as indignation.
But the Oversight Committee isn't asking about UFOs because they're curious about alien life. They're deposing the Clintons because the DOJ released files connecting Bill Clinton to a convicted sex offender, and the American public has a right to know what those files contain and what the people closest to the matter knew.
That Clinton chose to characterize cooperative testimony as something she endured rather than something she welcomed tells you everything about the posture. Nobody who has nothing to hide describes answering questions as something they "had to" do over and over.
Friday changes the equation
Bill Clinton's testimony is next. If his wife's deposition is any indication of the family's approach to these proceedings, expect more complaints about the process and fewer answers about the substance.
But this time, the cameras were rolling. The spin only works in the dark. Comer knows that. Mace knows that. And somewhere in Chappaqua, the Clintons know it too.





