A rift has emerged among House Republicans over a short-term spending deal.

There's a growing divide among House Republicans. Some are opposing a short-term deal that aims to extend government funding through October's end, potentially preventing a government shutdown.

This disagreement has brought to light concerns about the party's unity and direction.

Rep. Matt Rosendale, a member of the Freedom Caucus from Montana, is at the forefront of this opposition. He expressed his reservations about the spending, which he feels mirrors the Democratic approach.

Rosendale stated, "I've said for months now that I will not support a continuing resolution that is merely an extension of Nancy Pelosi's spending and Joe Biden's policies that we voted against, that Republicans voted against for the last two years."

Rosendale's Stance on the Issue

When questioned about his stance, Rosendale emphasized the importance of passing the appropriations bills. He believes that the Congress should be proactive in their duties.

"I think the message that we need to send is that Congress needs to do their job. They need to pass the 12 appropriation bills, they need to get the non-defense discretionary spending reduced to $1.47 trillion, which is what Speaker McCarthy agreed he was going to help us to accomplish," he elaborated.

Interestingly, Rosendale's criticism wasn't solely directed at the Democrats. He also expressed disappointment with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's approach, drawing parallels between him and Pelosi.

"We're seeing the same kind of work ethic come out of Speaker McCarthy that we saw from Speaker Pelosi… and I'm not going to support that," Rosendale remarked.

However, not all Republicans share Rosendale's sentiments. Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy argued that opposing the resolution might send the wrong message. He believes that supporting the measure could show that Republicans are ready to fund a government that will "actually do its job and secure the border."

Other Republicans Join the Opposition

It's not just Rosendale who's voicing concerns. Other House Republicans, including Reps. Dan Bishop, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Anna Paulina-Luna, and Eli Crane, have also expressed their opposition to the bill.

They've taken to social media platforms to share their views and concerns about the proposed spending deal, Fox News reported.

For instance, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene voiced her opposition on a social media platform, stating, "CR negotiated by Byron Donalds and Dusty Johnson.

No policy riders in the CR. So it’s all the policies from last year’s Democrat appropriations, with an 8% cut. Plus the border bill, but no E-Verify. I’m a NO."

Similarly, Rep. Dan Bishop emphasized the need for action, saying, "No CR. Pass the damn approps bills. Roll back the crazy bureaucracy to pre-COVID levels. Now."

Details of the Spending Deal

A draft of the agreement reveals that there are no cuts planned for defense, veterans affairs, or disaster relief. However, other areas covered by Congress’ 12 appropriations bills will see a reduction of about 8%. Additionally, the deal includes the Republicans' border security bill H.R. 2, but it omits a provision mandating E-Verify.

The continuing resolution is expected to be voted on soon, and its outcome will undoubtedly have significant implications for the Republican party and the nation as a whole.

It's clear that this situation is more than just a disagreement over a spending deal. It's a reflection of the broader challenges and divisions within the Republican party. As they navigate these internal conflicts, one can only hope that they'll find a way to come together for the greater good of the country.

Conclusion

• House Republicans are divided over a short-term spending deal.
• Rep. Matt Rosendale is leading the opposition, expressing concerns about the spending's similarity to Democratic policies.
• Several other Republicans have also voiced their opposition to the bill on social media.
• The proposed deal includes no cuts for defense, veterans affairs, or disaster relief but will reduce other areas by about 8%.
• The outcome of the vote on this resolution will have significant implications for the Republican party and the nation.

Please consider sharing this article on Twitter and Facebook to keep others informed.