Ten Commandments monument reinstalled at Kentucky Capitol after legal and political battle
After four decades out of view, the Ten Commandments monument is back on the front lawn of Kentucky’s Capitol—and it’s causing precisely the conversation our founders would expect and welcome.
This week, the state of Kentucky reinstalled the monument, which had been originally donated in 1971, citing its historical and cultural relevance through a resolution passed by a wide margin in both chambers of the state legislature, as Fox News reports.
The monument was first erected by the Fraternal Order of Eagles, a civic group that donated more than 100 of these stone tablets across America in the mid-20th century. In Kentucky, the display stood outside the Capitol until it was quietly removed around 1980 during a construction project—not due to controversy, but bulldozers and blueprints.
Legal Challenges Halted Reinstallation for Years
Attempts to restore the monument in 2000 hit a legal wall when the ACLU filed a lawsuit, arguing the display violated the Constitution. A federal judge agreed, using a now-defunct interpretation known as the Lemon test, which preferred a sterilized view of public spaces over historical honesty.
But the U.S. Supreme Court scrapped that outdated metric in 2022 during the Kennedy v. Bremerton School District case, pivoting toward “historical practices and understandings” to assess Establishment Clause claims—a shift that cleared the legal path for Kentucky lawmakers to act.
Enter House Joint Resolution 15. Introduced by Rep. Shane Baker, R-Somerset, it passed the House with a commanding 79–13 vote and the Senate by 32–6. The measure didn’t call for a religious revival, just recognition of a historical artifact that had been sidelined for decades.
Supporters Say It Reflects History, Not Sectarianism
"I am pleased to see this historic Ten Commandments monument returned to its rightful place," Baker said, adding the commandments’ role in America’s legal and civic development is "widely recognized." His point is hard to argue with for anyone who’s opened a history book instead of a hashtag thread.
Attorney General Russell Coleman echoed that sentiment, calling the commandments “at the heart of America’s history and founding.” He cited the perseverance involved in the monument’s return and credited Solicitor General Matt Kuhn for locating and facilitating the restoration.
It’s worth noting that the Fraternal Order of Eagles was instrumental in this endeavor from the start. Vic Jeffries, a trustee from the Hopkinsville chapter, said the group was “thrilled” and proud to see the monument reinstated where it “belongs.” Hard to disagree—it’s their gift, after all.
Critics Worry About Precedent and Inclusivity
Yet not everyone is ready to celebrate. State Rep. Joshua Watkins admitted the reinstallation gave him “a little heartburn,” citing church–state concerns that persist despite the Supreme Court’s revised guidance.
State Sen. Keturah Herron questioned the singular focus on the Ten Commandments, asking what it might mean for other faiths hoping to showcase their traditions at the Capitol. It's a valid question, but one that tends to conflate neutrality with exclusion.
Rep. Baker countered that the law wasn’t about promoting religion but acknowledging the commandments’ longstanding influence in American judicial and legislative systems. It isn’t about evangelism—it’s about accuracy.
Public Spaces Reflect Shared Heritage
Of course, in today’s climate, any nod to Western tradition is branded exclusionary by the professional outrage class. But the reality is that our laws didn’t rise from a vacuum—they were drawn from somewhere, and the Ten Commandments are part of that inheritance.
As First Liberty Institute attorney Roger Byron pointed out, this type of public monument “recognizes the unique and important role the Ten Commandments have played in state and national history.” And like Byron, many believe it’s past time to stop erasing inconvenient facts under the guise of fairness.
The state of Kentucky has made a clear statement—not of religious dominance, but of historical recognition. That’s a line worth drawing in stone.




