Trump administration continues deportations despite court order, case may reach Supreme Court
A high-stakes legal battle unfolds as the Trump administration challenges a federal judge's authority over Venezuelan gang member deportations.
According to the New York Post, the administration proceeded with deportation flights carrying over 250 accused gang members to El Salvador, directly contradicting US District Judge James Boasberg's 14-day restraining order against invoking the 1789 Alien Enemies Act.
The controversial move occurred just one day after Judge Boasberg's emergency hearing, where he explicitly ordered any deportation flights to return to US soil.
Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele confirmed the arrival of 238 Tren de Aragua members and 23 MS-13 gang members, who were immediately transferred to the country's Terrorism Confinement Center.
Administration justifies legal defiance
White House officials maintain their position that Judge Boasberg's order came too late to halt the deportations. Senior administration sources argue the flights had already reached international waters when the restraining order was issued, placing them beyond the court's jurisdiction.
The administration's stance sets up an unprecedented confrontation between executive and judicial powers. A senior White House official told Axios: "Very important that people understand we are not actively defying court orders."
The Trump administration appears confident in their legal strategy. Another White House insider stated: "This is headed to the Supreme Court. And we're going to win."
El Salvador's role in mass deportation plan
President Bukele's government agreed to accept the accused gang members following negotiations with Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
The arrangement, secured during recent diplomatic meetings, includes an undisclosed financial compensation described as "relatively low." El Salvador's cooperation marks a significant shift in regional immigration enforcement strategies.
Dramatic footage shared by President Trump on Truth Social showed the prisoners' arrival, with heavily armed commandos escorting shackled men from transport planes to armored vehicles. The president's social media post emphasized his administration's tough stance on immigration enforcement and criticized Democratic leadership.
Historical significance of Alien Enemies Act
The Trump administration's invocation of the 1789 Alien Enemies Act represents the first time this wartime legislation has been used since World War II.
During that period, the law provided legal grounds for placing noncitizen Japanese, Germans, and Italians in internment camps. Legal experts note the controversial nature of reviving such historic legislation for modern immigration enforcement.
The administration's interpretation of this centuries-old law challenges conventional understanding of executive powers in immigration matters. Critics argue this unprecedented application could have far-reaching implications for constitutional rights and judicial oversight of executive actions.
Judicial and executive branch showdown
A senior White House official characterized the situation as an inevitable confrontation between government branches. The administration views the case as particularly suitable for Supreme Court review, given the criminal background of the deportees and national security implications.
Judge Boasberg's restraining order specifically targeted the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act for deportations without hearings. The judge's directive explicitly ordered any airborne deportees to be returned to the United States, setting up a direct challenge to executive authority.
Final outcome awaits Supreme Court decision
The Trump administration's defiance of Judge Boasberg's restraining order has triggered a constitutional showdown over executive authority in immigration enforcement.
Over 250 accused gang members, primarily from the Venezuelan prison gang Tren de Aragua, now reside in El Salvador's maximum-security facility following their controversial deportation.
The case's resolution now depends on Supreme Court deliberations, with potential implications for executive power, immigration policy, and judicial oversight. President Bukele's government continues to cooperate with US authorities, housing the deportees in their notorious Terrorism Confinement Center while legal battles persist in American courts.