Trump holds firm in advocating for US control over Panama Canal
In a bold declaration, President Donald Trump has once again vocalized his intention for the United States to regain control over the Panama Canal, citing alleged mismanagement and violations by Panama of prior agreements.
Trump's assertive stance on the Panama Canal comes amid concerns about China's influence and international legal disputes, as Breitbart reports.
During a statement made in December, Trump criticized Panama for high transit fees and what he described as unfavorable treatment of the United States. These issues have fueled his call for reassessing the control over the canal, which was originally constructed by the U.S. over a century ago.
Trump signed several executive orders related to this matter ahead of a critical discussion. He announced that Secretary of State Marco Rubio would engage in diplomatic talks in Panama, part of his broader South American tour, to address these grievances.
The historical context provided by Trump emphasized that the Panama Canal was built by the U.S. 110 years ago, branding it as "one of the great wonders of the world" and the costliest development endeavor undertaken by the country at that time.
Rubio Assigned Crucial Diplomatic Task
The president has tasked Rubio with addressing the canal's issues directly with Panamanian leaders.
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the apparent presence of signage in Chinese, claiming it violates the terms agreed upon with Panama, which has led to further tension.
Trump's assertion that 70% of signage was initially in Chinese has sparked significant controversy; however, he also noted that Panama has been actively removing these signs in response to U.S. concerns.
According to Trump, these actions by Panama signify a breach of the original agreement made with the United States, thus justifying his call to "take it back."
This has set the stage for a complex discussion about international law and territorial rights.
Panamanian President Responds to U.S. Claims
Panama's President José Raúl Mulino has responded firmly to Trump's claims, asserting that the Panama Canal and its adjacent areas remain under Panamanian sovereignty. Mulino emphasized that any discussions about the U.S. reclaiming control over the canal are not just unlikely, but "impossible."
Panama has also escalated the matter to the international level. The Panamanian permanent representative Eloy Alfaro de Alba sent a detailed letter to the U.N. secretary-general, highlighting potential violations of international law, specifically referencing Article 2 of the United Nations charter which prohibits the use of force against any state's territorial integrity.
As tensions continue to escalate, the international community is closely monitoring the developments. The issue touches on significant legal principles, sovereign rights, and the geopolitical influence of major powers in the region.
International Law, Territorial Sovereignty in Focus
The historical and current geopolitical significance of the Panama Canal cannot be overstated. Its strategic importance was the reason the U.S. undertook its massive construction in the early 20th century, a point repeatedly emphasized by Trump as part of his rationale for reclaiming control.
However, the canal has been under Panamanian control as per the terms negotiated during its handover by the U.S. in 1999. These agreements are now at the heart of the current dispute, with both countries interpreting their terms differently.
As Secretary of State Marco Rubio prepares for his upcoming discussions in Panama, the stakes are high. His diplomatic skills will be tested as he navigates between Trump’s assertive policy directives and Panama’s staunch defense of its sovereignty.
In conclusion, this unfolding scenario might not only redefine U.S.-Panama relations but could also influence international norms on property rights and state sovereignty.
The world watches as these diplomatic discussions are set to begin, possibly reshaping an important piece of global infrastructure policy.