Trump says black voters will reject El-Sayed for scorning and mocking them
President Trump said black voters will not back Michigan Democrat Abdul El-Sayed because the Senate nominee scorns, mocks, and disrespects them, a charge that tracks complaints already voiced by black Democrats and community leaders.
In a Truth Social post on Tuesday, Trump wrote that El-Sayed’s own posture toward black voters would sink him with the very constituency Democrats treat as automatic.
The president put the question in plain terms and answered it himself.
President DJT stated:
"Why would black people vote for Mohammed El-Sayed when he openly scorns them, mocks them, and disrespects them? THEY WON’T! President DJT"
El-Sayed is the Democratic nominee in Michigan’s open Senate race against Republican Mike Rogers. Trump’s post landed after months of public friction between the nominee and black Democrats and community figures who say the campaign has treated their support as a given rather than something to earn.
Black Democrats and voters already flagged the same problem
Michigan state Rep. Karen Whitsett, a Democrat, spoke out against El-Sayed in September. She accused the party’s socialist wing of treating black support as automatic and said El-Sayed had failed to back the interests of Michigan’s black communities. She also questioned how he would put Medicare for All into practice.
Whitsett told Fox News Digital the pattern looked familiar.
"It doesn’t change, it’s just different slave owners,"
That is not a fringe complaint. It is a sitting Democratic lawmaker saying her own party’s left wing still treats black voters as a captive bloc.
Similar doubts showed up in primary polling. A July report found Rep. Haley Stevens leading El-Sayed by 46 points among black primary voters. The gap was large enough to signal that El-Sayed’s message was not landing with the voters Democrats usually count on first.
Detroit outreach trouble surfaced next. On October 7, CNN reported that an unnamed black community leader left a conversation with the campaign convinced it did not think it needed to work hard for black votes. The leader said El-Sayed promised an invite to a roundtable and never followed through. The leader texted the candidate and got silence.
The leader’s reaction was blunt.
"I felt so bad. I texted him,"... "But I didn’t hear back. So, F, him."
That account is not a Republican talking point. It is a black community figure describing a broken promise and a campaign that stopped answering.
Focus group voters said they felt taken for granted
An MS NOW focus group captured the same frustration from black voters themselves. One woman said El-Sayed appeared to bank on party loyalty instead of showing up for local problems.
She put it this way:
"I think he’s taking advantage [of] we as Black people are Democratic, and he think we gonna vote for him anyway,"... "And I’m like, ‘No sir, I’m gonna put uncommitted down on that little circle and move on.’ If you’re going to Congress to represent me, I need you to talk about what’s going on in this community."
Uncommitted. Not a soft lean. A voter saying she would skip the candidate if he would not address her community’s concerns. That is the opposite of locked-in support.
El-Sayed has addressed tension between Arab and black communities in his own words. On the Higher Learning podcast he said, “Too often when folks meet somebody who looks like me, it’s not a good experience.” The remark acknowledged friction. It did not erase the outreach failures already on the record.
Those failures sit alongside other campaign controversies that have dogged the nominee, including backlash over social media posts that drew party criticism.
Trump widens the case against El-Sayed and backs Rogers
Trump has not limited his criticism to the black-voter question. In a separate post detailed by Just the News, he labeled El-Sayed a “RADICAL Extremist, Terrorist Sympathizer” and tied him to streamer Hasan Piker, while giving Rogers his “COMPLETE AND TOTAL ENDORSEMENT.”
Trump wrote that El-Sayed “goes back to the days of the Jihad” and called him “no different from his best friend, America Hating Hasan Piker.” The same association has already drawn pressure from inside the Democratic Party, including when Fetterman challenged El-Sayed over continuing to campaign with the far-left streamer.
After the candidates’ Thursday night debate, Trump went further on performance. Fox News reported that he said Rogers “completely obliterated” El-Sayed and that “if this was a fight they would have stopped it.” Trump called Rogers a “total winner” and a “great American Patriot.”
The debate verdict fits the larger picture Trump is drawing: a weak Democratic nominee who is short on stature, patriotism, and truth, matched against a Republican Trump is willing to endorse without reservation.
Other questions about El-Sayed’s judgment have followed him on the trail, including a claim that he questioned the need for armed police while relying on armed protection himself. Voters notice gaps like that.
Michigan’s race sits inside a wider Democratic problem
El-Sayed’s trouble with black voters is not happening in a vacuum. Democrats are already managing midterm strain, with Biden largely off the trail while other figures try to carry the load. In a competitive Michigan Senate seat, a nominee who alienates core Democratic voters makes that burden heavier.
Whitsett’s warning, the 46-point primary deficit among black voters, the unanswered text from a Detroit leader, and the focus-group threat to mark “uncommitted” all point the same direction. A campaign that assumes loyalty instead of earning it gives those voters a reason to walk.
Trump’s Tuesday post did not invent that record. It named it. Black Democrats and black voters had already described scorn, neglect, and the sense of being taken for granted. Trump’s conclusion followed the evidence they put on the table: they will not back a candidate who treats them that way.
Parties that treat any community as a permanent possession eventually learn the cost. Michigan’s black voters are not a machine lever, and candidates who mock or ignore them should not expect their votes.






