ABC News faces backlash over reporting style on murdered Israeli hostages
A media outlet's choice of words in describing the fate of Israeli hostages held by Hamas has sparked outrage among politicians and social media users.
According to The Western Journal, ABC News drew intense criticism for using terms like "deceased" and "dead" instead of "murdered" when reporting about hostages killed by Hamas terrorists, including two young children.
The controversy erupted after ABC News posted on X about Hamas's planned release of hostage bodies. Their post announced the scheduled return of four deceased hostages on Thursday and six living hostages on Saturday, with four more dead hostages to be released the following week.
This careful word choice immediately triggered a wave of responses from prominent political figures and concerned citizens.
Public figures denounce media word choice
Senator Mike Lee of Utah led the charge against ABC's reporting style, directly challenging the network's terminology.
His response highlighted the brutal nature of the hostages' deaths, particularly emphasizing the young victims involved. The post garnered significant attention, accumulating over 750,000 views and 1,300 responses within hours of its publication.
Former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley joined the criticism, expressing her anger at media outlets, avoiding direct language about the murders. Her statement emphasized the tragic fate of two innocent babies and their mother, whose bodies were later used as bargaining tools by terrorists.
Haley stated:
Shame on any media outlet that can't call this what it is, murder. Two innocent babies, their mother, and others did not simply 'die'. They were kidnapped, murdered, and their bodies were held as bargaining chips by terrorists.
Young victims identified amid controversy
The identities of the murdered hostages revealed a heartbreaking story of family tragedy. Among the victims were brothers Kfir and Ariel Bibas, aged 9 months and 3 years respectively, who were captured during Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack. This assault stands as the deadliest attack on Jewish people since the Holocaust.
Their father, Yarden Bibas, was released from captivity on February 1, unaware of his family's fate. The boys' mother, Shiri, was also among those killed. Hamas claimed the family died in an Israeli airstrike in November 2023, though such claims require skepticism given the group's history of unreliable statements.
The Israeli Prime Minister's office chose stronger language, referring to the victims as "slain" rather than deceased. This word choice stands in stark contrast to ABC's more neutral terminology, which many critics viewed as an attempt to minimize the brutal nature of the deaths.
Media ethics under scrutiny
The controversy has raised questions about journalistic responsibility in covering sensitive international conflicts.
Critics argue that neutral language in situations involving clear acts of terrorism can mislead audiences and diminish the gravity of such events. The incident has become a focal point for broader discussions about media bias and editorial decision-making.
Social media users have joined the chorus of criticism, with many expressing their disapproval of ABC's reporting approach.
The response has been overwhelmingly negative, with users accusing the network of deliberately softening the impact of terrorist actions through careful word selection.
Final assessment of media response
ABC News's coverage of the Israeli hostages situation has become a lightning rod for criticism of mainstream media reporting practices.
The network's choice to use terms like "deceased" and "dead" instead of more direct language describing the murders committed by Hamas terrorists sparked widespread condemnation from political figures and the public alike.
The controversy surrounding the deaths of Kfir and Ariel Bibas, along with their mother, Shiri, highlights the ongoing debate about responsible journalism in conflict zones. As media outlets continue to cover similar situations, this incident serves as a reminder of the impact word choice can have on public understanding of tragic events.