'Evangelicals for Harris' Leveraging Billy Graham in Anti-Trump Ads Could Spark Legal Fire
An advertising blitz positioning a legendary preacher's words against a former president is escalating tensions and risking legal action.
A recent campaign by the political action committee Evangelicals for Harris juxtaposes former President Donald Trump’s past statements with sermon snippets from Billy Graham to challenge his character, Blaze Media reported.
Evangelicals for Harris, endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris, rolled out an ad that has stirred up significant controversy. This campaign features footage from a 1988 Billy Graham sermon, set against clips of Donald Trump speaking about his life ethos. The ad paints Trump as deeply flawed by the standards of the sermon, characterizing him as "self-centered," "greedy," and disingenuous about his religious commitments.
Legal Challenges Mount Over Copyright Infringement Claims
The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association (BGEA) quickly reacted to this campaign, issuing multiple cease-and-desist notices to the Evangelicals for Harris group. Their chief complaint is that the political use of Graham's sermon was not authorized and infringes upon copyright laws held by the association.
The Christian Post has reported that the campaign comes with a heavy price tag exceeding $1 million, demonstrating the group's commitment to influencing public opinion and voter perceptions as the political season heats up.
The BGEA has been clear in its stance, emphasizing that Billy Graham never publicly criticized U.S. presidents during or after his time of active ministry, and used his role to provide spiritual counsel, not political commentary. They argue that Graham’s words are being misappropriated to serve a political agenda, which is contrary to the intentions of his lifelong ministry.
Evangelicals for Harris Defends Its Campaign Choices
In response to BGEA's threats of legal action, Evangelicals for Harris stands firm on their campaign strategy. They insist that the sermon is legitimately used under the Copyright Act, and have positioned their ad as a critique using Trump’s public statements. This aligns with their broader message that parallels Trump's character with warnings from scripture about leadership integrity.
One of the more striking aspects of the ad juxtaposes Trump’s acknowledgment of his greed with Graham’s admonition from the pulpit, pointing towards a spiritual and ethical dissonance between Graham's messages and Trump's actions.
Despite pending legal threats, Evangelicals for Harris has expressed readiness to defend their campaign in court if pushed by BGEA. Their statement retorted that Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham and a prominent Trump supporter, is merely attempting to silence their critique because it starkly contrasts Trump’s actions and statements with biblical teachings.
Impact of the Advertisement on Public and Political Spheres
The deployment of this ad campaign illustrates a bold strategy by a pro-Harris group aiming to resonate with evangelical voters — a demographic that has shown substantial support for Trump in past elections. By drawing from a well-respected evangelical figure such as Billy Graham, the group aims to provoke reflection on the moral and ethical dimensions of political figures.
However, this approach may carry risks. Utilizing a revered religious leader's voice to critique a political figure could alienate some believers who follow Graham's teachings and respect his legacy of staying above the political fray.
As the narrative unfolds, both Evangelicals for Harris and BGEA continue to articulate their positions, potentially influencing voter perceptions as they digest the interplay of religion, politics, and personal character in this unusual confrontation.