Former Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard has made startling allegations about Vice President Kamala Harris's debate preparation.

According to Breitbart News, Gabbard claims that Harris took acting lessons and received coaching from Hollywood advisors before the ABC presidential debate on September 10, 2024.

The accusations come in the wake of widespread social media reaction to Harris's exaggerated facial expressions during the debate with former President Donald Trump. Gabbard, who recently endorsed Trump and now serves as an advisor to his campaign, shared these claims during a Fox News interview prior to the debate.

Hollywood's Alleged Influence On Debate Preparation

Gabbard's allegations suggest a significant level of Hollywood involvement in Harris's debate strategy. She asserts that Harris secluded herself in a hotel room for intensive acting lessons, working with Hollywood advisors and utilizing professional lighting setups.

The former congresswoman's statements paint a picture of a meticulously choreographed performance designed to sway public opinion. Gabbard expressed her belief that this approach aims to manipulate media coverage and voter perception, stating:

That's why she has locked herself in a hotel room, taking extreme acting lessons. She's got Hollywood advisers, stages, the Hollywood lights in the hopes that her friends in ABC and propaganda media declare her the winner. And that may be enough to trick the voters to vote for her. But I don't think American people are going to fall for this.

These claims raise questions about the authenticity of political performances and the role of media preparation in high-stakes debates.

Social Media Reaction To Harris's Debate Performance

The vice president's debate appearance garnered significant attention on social media platforms. Users widely commented on and often ridiculed Harris's facial expressions, particularly when Trump was speaking. The exaggerated reactions seemed to many observers as an attempt to dominate the split-screen coverage.

Walter Kirn, author of "Up in the Air," noted that Harris's constant facial emoting appeared to be a deliberate strategy to influence viewers' reactions.

This observation aligns with Gabbard's claims about Harris's alleged acting lessons and suggests a calculated approach to visual communication during the debate.

Hollywood's Growing Influence In Politics

The allegations about Harris's debate preparation highlight the increasing intersection between Hollywood and politics. According to the report, Harris has become a favorite among left-wing Hollywood elites, who have shifted their support from President Joe Biden to the vice president in recent months.

This shift in Hollywood allegiance underscores the entertainment industry's ongoing influence in political campaigns. The involvement of high-profile entertainment figures in political strategy and fundraising continues to shape the landscape of American elections.

One notable connection mentioned in the report is the relationship between Harris and Disney executive Dana Walden. Walden, who oversees ABC News, is described as a close personal friend of the vice president. This relationship has raised questions about potential conflicts of interest, given Walden's position and her history of donations to Harris's political campaigns.

The report also mentions that Harris once credited Walden and her husband for her marriage during a 2022 fundraiser, further illustrating the close ties between the vice president and influential figures in the entertainment industry.

Implications For Political Discourse And Voter Perception

Gabbard's allegations and the subsequent public reaction to Harris's debate performance raise important questions about the nature of political communication in the modern era. The focus on presentation and performance, as evidenced by the alleged acting lessons and Hollywood coaching, suggests a shift towards a more theatrical approach to political debates.

This trend potentially impacts how voters perceive candidates and make electoral decisions. While polished performances may be visually appealing, they also risk overshadowing substantive policy discussions and genuine interactions between candidates.

The public's reaction to Harris's facial expressions during the debate indicates a heightened awareness of non-verbal communication in political contexts. Voters are increasingly attuned to these visual cues, often interpreting them as indicators of a candidate's authenticity or lack thereof.

Conclusion

Gabbard's claims about Harris taking acting lessons with Hollywood advisors before the ABC presidential debate have sparked discussions about the role of performance in politics. The vice president's exaggerated facial expressions during the debate led to widespread social media ridicule, aligning with Gabbard's allegations of a choreographed approach.

This situation highlights the growing influence of Hollywood in political campaigns, as exemplified by Harris's reported popularity among left-wing entertainment elites. The close relationship between Harris and Disney executive Dana Walden, who oversees ABC News, further illustrates the intertwining of politics and entertainment.